My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:58:51 AM
Creation date
1/19/2007 3:21:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/23/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Jean Jackson, 17251 Armstrong Boulevard NW, she has a seven acre lot with 80 acres <br />around her. To her cluster means they will put 31 houses in 18 acres with the common septic <br />system up against her border, leaving the rest of the acreage open. When they say 2 Y2 acres per <br />house they should say one house per 2 Y2 acres, instead they are saying it covers the whole 80 <br />acres and put everything in one area. The houses will be on 1/3 acre lots, and when City sewer <br />and water comes in they will put another 180 houses across the street from her. 2 ~ acres should <br />mean one house on 2 ~ acres all the way across the land instead of 31 houses on 18 acres, <br />leaving it open for City sewer and water to come and put in the rest of the 186 houses. <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt summarized Ms. Jackson does not supp <br />2 Y2 acre lots with one house per 2 V2 acres. <br /> <br />Mr. Ken Thomas, 17955 Argon Street NW, s <br />The Planning Commission needs to look at e <br />landowners are going through, but they need to <br />get out or if it will restrict others around them. Th <br />rural area and they do not have exits. Safety <br />gridlock seven miles out of Anoka. <br /> <br />Mr. Zaetsch suggested the Commission <br />40; clustering; 2 ~ acres. <br /> <br />A show of hands reflected the followin <br />Supportive of clustering: 1 <br />Opposed to clustering: about 9 <br />Supportive of 4 in 40: about <br />Supportive of 2 ~ acre lot <br />Supportive of something v <br /> <br />venue NW, stated he is in favor of2 ~ acres. It is <br />e property he is a partial owner of is surrounded <br />. de. He there was the person that was here about putting <br />ong the single family homes, but he is being told he cannot <br />lots. <br /> <br />Mr. iger Street NW, stated he can appreciate people's view on <br />being r a how people should be able to develop their land within the <br />zoning 1iml can. He believes the 4 in 40 was probably originally developed <br />to limit until of the City could be developed and then the development would <br />continue northwar . on a fairly small lot by comparison to some; he has 10 acres. He <br />would love to subdivI , he has a couple of sons ready for houses, but he would be happy to <br />forego the development of the property and leave it as it is in order to avoid a cluster <br />development anywhere in the City. He does not think cluster development is in keeping with the <br />whole flavor of this town. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 4, 2007 <br />Page 22 of 36 <br /> <br />-263- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.