My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/10/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2026
>
Agenda - Council - 03/10/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2026 4:37:32 PM
Creation date
3/6/2026 10:49:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/10/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: <br />03/10/2026 <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: Promote economic growth and development. <br />5. 19. <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #26-074 Approving the Final Plat for Serenity at Rivers Edge (Project No. 26-101): Case of <br />Rivers Edge Development LLC <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received a Land Use Application from Rivers Edge Development LLC (the "Applicant") to <br />subdivide a property that is located on the south side of Riverdale Drive, between Dolomite Street and Sunfish <br />Lake Boulevard (the "Subject Property"), into two (2) single family residential lots and a large outlot for future <br />development. This subdivision is considered a "Minor Plat" in City Code. <br />Notification: <br />Public notification was mailed to property owners within 700 feet of the Subject Property. A legal notice was <br />placed in the February 13, 2026, Anoka Union Herald Newspaper. A development sign was placed on the <br />Subject Property as well. <br />Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br />Project Overview <br />The Applicant is proposing to subdivide the Subject Property into two (2) single family residential lots along with <br />a larger outlot. The intention is to ultimately develop the outlot into single-family residential lots, similar to the <br />two buildable lots created by this plat. However, the Applicant cannot meet the current density requirements <br />(2.25-4 units per acre), without essentially clear -cutting the existing tree cover on the Subject Property. The <br />Subject Property abuts the Mississippi River, which means it is also located within the Mississippi River Corridor <br />Critical Area (MRCCA) Overlay District. This overlay district includes additional regulations addressing <br />vegetation management and land disturbance, amongst other things. The Applicant has stated a desire to limit the <br />overall impact on the Subject Property and has proposed to 'custom' develop each lot to minimize impacts on <br />existing natural resources. As part of the upcoming Comprehensive Plan Update process, Staff will be proposing <br />a 'River District', applicable to both the Scenic River Protection Overlay District (Rum River) and the MRCCA <br />(Mississippi River) Overlay District. A lower density requirement would align more with the intent of both <br />overlay districts, which is to minimize disturbance of existing natural resources, which, by default, helps protect <br />water quality. <br />Zoning and Guidance <br />The Subject Property is zoned R-1A (Single Family Residential) and is guided as Low Density Residential in the <br />2040 Comprehensive Plan. Based on the R-lA zoning designation, each lot has at least eighty (80) feet of <br />frontage along a public road (Riverdale Drive) and has an area of at least 10,000 square feet. The Applicant is <br />attempting to mirror the existing development pattern east of the Subject Property, where parcels range in size <br />from about 0.60 acres to about 0.80 acres and each has approximately 80-110 feet of frontage along Riverdale <br />Drive. The proposed home sites are further back from Riverdale Drive than the maximum allowable setback (35 <br />feet). However, where an existing setback pattern is established, new homes can be sited to conform with the <br />existing, prevailing setback. The Applicant has stated that there happens to be a break in tree cover slightly closer <br />to the river than the existing, prevailing setback pattern to the east, and their goal was to site the house pads in this <br />'break', to further reduce tree loss on the Subject Property. <br />Staff is working with the Applicant on a solution to the maximum front yard setback standard. Generally <br />speaking, the Planning Commission was supportive of deviating from the established front yard setback pattern if <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.