My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 02/13/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:59:47 AM
Creation date
2/9/2007 3:07:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/13/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
523
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Citizen Input • <br />There was none. <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Cleveland, to close the public hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Cleveland, Hunt, Levine, Trites <br />Rolle,.and Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Brauer. <br />The public hearing was closed at 10:25 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order at 10:25 <br />p.m. <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle questioned if the change in parking requirements will result in <br />significantly less parking. She asked how it will be determined that there will be sufficient <br />parking for employees, the public, apartment building residents, etc. with the change to <br />maximum allowable parking.stalls. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes replied this change would allow significantly less parking. Staff <br />discussed this extensively. and it was determined that the retailers and the users always want more • <br />parking. Staff does not feel with the street and public parking that would.be available that users <br />will build less parking than .what is demanded; the market will determine how much parking <br />would be needed. This proposed change is up for scrutiny if the Commission does not agree. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy requested further information regarding the maximum allowable <br />parking. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes replied the key is to limit the sea of parking resulting from parking <br />minimums. If they are going to lower the FAR they need a protection for the parking. The <br />majority of the intent is to counter the FAR change, but also to keep developers from building as <br />much parking as they want. She noted almost every development that has come through has had <br />variances to the FAR. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy inquired about drive -thrus being allowed in TC -3 areas. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes indicated the TC -3 area is the eastern part of Ramsey Town Center <br />with the medical office. Drive -thrus were not permitted at all, and now would be a conditional <br />use to allow for requests from pharmacies and other retail with the ability to limit the type of <br />drive -thru. She indicated the statement excluding pharmacies will be eliminated from the use <br />list. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy inquired about accessory car washes being permitted in the TC -2 area. • <br />Planning Commission /January 4, 2007 <br />Page 30 of 35 <br />-32- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.