Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Finance Officer Lund explained that the total proposed levy for 2007 is $8,634,981, which is a <br />reduction of $41 0,829 since it was preliminary adopted in September. That would be an increase <br />in property taxes of 21.15% over 2006. Ms. Lund explained that the reason for increase is the <br />EDA budget was increased $50,000 to clean up blighted properties within the City, new debt for <br />the Ramsey Municipal Center, reduction of building permits received by the City due to the slow <br />down in the housing market, additional staffing needs, necessary equipment purchases including <br />a new fire truck, and increasing health insurance costs. Overall the tax capacity is relatively the <br />same as last year. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund noted that the rumors regarding the City being bankrupt and being in debt $60 million <br />dollars from Ramsey Town Center is not true. There was no City financing related to Ramsey <br />Town Center. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called for public comment at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Owner of Lano Equipment stated that he is a business and commercial landowner in the City of <br />Ramsey and was trying to get a handle on a few things. He stated that he understands how taxes <br />work and realizes growth in the area is slowing down, but now they are seeing an increase of <br />levies just to do business in the City. As growth is slowing the City receives less revenue <br />because there are fewer building permits being issued and yet the City still has to find a way to <br />pay for infrastructure so property owners are left to pick up the slack. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund replied that it is not infrastructure that the levy would pay for, but the cost of <br />maintaining existing services. The levy covers general operating expenditures; infrastructure is <br />funded by other funds. The problem is the City anticipated higher revenue from building permits <br />in 2006 and because those funds did not come in the City now needs to levy for those funds. <br /> <br />The owner of Lano inquired how the additional debt service for the Municipal Center will impact <br />the City's bond rating. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund explained that the City maintained an Al bond rating when they structured the debt for <br />the building because of the anticipated growth in the area. Obviously now that growth has <br />slowed significantly. <br /> <br />The owner ofLano inquired as to what they anticipate the City's bond rating to be because of the <br />slow down. <br /> <br />Ms. Lund replied that their bond rating would depend on what the City issues bonds for the next <br />time around. The City did not issue any bonds in 2006; the bonds for the Municipal Center were <br />issued in 2005. She noted that the Ramsey Crossing development is putting together a letter of <br />credit for the total cost of the project. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that he anticipates the City maintaining the bond rating of Al <br />because if that changes it affects the interest rates on all of the City's debt structure. That is an <br />issue that the Council is very aware of and will work very hard to maintain. <br /> <br />City Council Truth in Taxation/December 4, 2006 <br />Page 2 of9 <br />