My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 12/21/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2006
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 12/21/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:18:57 PM
Creation date
2/12/2007 8:26:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mayor Gamec asked if there was another way to work with Anoka County and possibly even <br />Congressman Oberstar. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that Mr. Boike is quite persistent. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that sometimes it is difficult to do, but Mr. Boike needs to understand that <br />City Staff needs to rely on City Council direction <br /> <br />Ms. Ruehle stated that The Tinklenberg Group can be flexible to preserve the corridor with <br />whoever owns the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson stated that he has had several realtors inquiring about his own property. <br />He stated there is definite interest in the Boike property and realtors have indicated a value <br />anywhere from $96,000 to $110,000 per acre. Mr. Pearson stated he thought the land should be <br />hung onto because the City couldn't lose. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec indicated his concern because it is a regional project. He expressed an interest in <br />pursuing Federal funding or working with the Metropolitan Council for some other funding <br />resource. He noted that the Landfill money is still taxpayer money. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated the City doesn't have an exact value of the property because <br />there is a land use that shows the property can't be used for anything other than for highway use <br />since it lacks access. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig indicated that if the Metropolitan Council could be persuaded to help out, <br />it may buy time. He stated that if Mr. Boike starts reverse condemnation, the price may go up. <br />He questioned what time would be the best to lock in. Councilmember Elvig stated he would be <br />willing to look at making some arrangement to put some dollars toward the project to keep it; <br />however, it is the cash up front and the timing that concerns him. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey inquired if the City would have to purchase the property with reverse <br />condemnation. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that would only be necessary when a land use can be shown. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if there were some agreement available to give them a minimal amount of <br />dollars to hold the project while the financing can be reviewed. <br /> <br />Ms. Ruehle replied that what the Mayor indicated is basically what The Tinklenberg Group is <br />also suggesting. She stated if the quarterly amount were to be split with Anoka County, the <br />City's half would only be $2500 per month. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if it released the pressure on behalf of the State to step in. <br /> <br />Ms. Ruehle stated that isn't a lot of money in her experience for this type of purchase. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / December 21,2006 <br />Page 4 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.