My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:30:14 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
98 <br /> <br />developments, could take months to accomplish. The premise of most cluster <br />development guidelines is very similar to PUD's in that the developer is allowed smaller <br />lot sizes and less infrastructure costs in exchange for preserving an amenity deemed to be <br />desirable to the City such as woodlands, common permanent open'space, etc. <br /> <br />Mr. Wirz' plat is also located in the Rum River Scenic Overlay District and the PUD or <br />cluster development would'require DNR.'s approval. <br /> <br />As discussed in the City Staff Review Letter, the design of the communal services would <br />have to comply with Minnesota Rules and development of an operation and maintenance <br />schedule would also be required. <br /> <br />If the plat goes forward as proposed, density transitioning would be required on the north <br />and south common property lines with adjacent properties. City Code requires a 45 foot <br />wide corridor with numerous tree plantings. It appears that the plat would have to be <br />redesigned to accommodate the 45 foot wide density transition corridor. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Mr. Wirz' plan does not meet the PUD criteria and the City does not have any provisions <br />in the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinances for cluster developments. City Staff <br />recommends that the sketch plan be denied. In addition, the Developer should be advised <br />to either reconfigures the plat to comply with the 2.5 acre lot size requirement, or submit <br />an application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances to <br />address cluster developments. <br /> <br />Commission Action: <br /> <br />Will be based on your discussion. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />Principal Planner <br />Associate Planner <br />Principal City Engineer <br />City Engineer <br />Engineering Technician <br /> <br />Copies To: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Parks & Utilities Supervisor <br />City Attorney <br /> <br />PC: 2/6/03 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.