Laserfiche WebLink
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, commissioners Kociscak, <br />Reeve, Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />NOTE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />The following Council minutes were noted: <br /> <br />1) City Council regular meeting minutes dated November 26, 201 <br />2) City Council regular meeting minutes dated December 10' <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review <br />'Development, LLC. <br /> <br />CaSe of LTR <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon <br />review to plat the Thomas <br />and 145~' Lane. The submitt~ <br />The property is currently zoned"'R-1 <br />Area. The City of Ramsey <br />family residential development not to <br />net acre if <br />density of the <br />property .,~ .;:~:~'~ <br />Comprehefiskve Plan <br /> <br />hl <br />move <br /> <br /> sketch plan <br /> Potassium Street <br /> Units on 29.08 acres. <br /> )olitan Urban Service <br /> for low density single <br /> per acre or up to 4 units per <br />Development (PUD). The goss <br />acre. Since the net density of the development <br />designation, the applicant will need a <br />use designation to Mediu¢ Density <br />ant. has indicated that they would first like to <br />feedback on-developing the land before they <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon noted the sketch <br /> <br /> plan proposes ~ . ~.-. than typically required for single family lots. Some 'lots are as small <br /> ~quare. fee~,.,.1.ot widths as narrow as 50 feet. The current minimum for urban single <br /> '~;~. . ~. ..... <br /> 10,800 s~.. fea~iiw~th lot w~dths of 80 feet. The apphcant ~s also proposing to <br /> have narro~er..~;.~,,~ nght~of-wm;~¢~some~. ~.: as small as 50 feet versus the 60-f0ot reqmrement, and <br /> extensive us,.~f,.rmvate ~:a/iag to serve the 38 association mmntamed' cottages. He noted the C~ty <br /> would prepa;~, traffic';;~npact study at the developers expense for ConsideratiOn at the- <br /> preliminary plumage. The sketch plan proposes many trails throughout the development. <br /> The <br /> sketch plan w~i;~'e reviewed by the. Park Board on January 9, 2003, at which time they will look <br /> . ,,~:,,.; ~ . . · . . . <br />x,,,.,.:at park dedmat~n fees or land ded~catmn, The sketch plan also proposes a buffer strip w~th a <br />:~.¢~J alon~tl~,'~ section that abuts exmtmg single-family lots. If this type of buffer ~s used to <br /> ~, ~k!~nsity transition requirements, the City requires a 25-foot minimum. The sketCh <br /> plan <br /> curacy shows 30 feet w~th add~tmnal tree planting. Portmns of the proposed parcel to be <br /> de~i~bed.~,~,, are contained in the Shoreland Overlay D~stnct.' ' Sunfish Lake is classified as a <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 2 of'10 <br /> <br />53 <br /> <br /> <br />