Laserfiche WebLink
e eet t Ordma ~ Wa e ...... <br />Recr ational Development Lake and land within 1000 fi of he ' ry H'gh t r <br />required to comply with the shOreland regulations. These regulations include a mi ~i~?.~,. <br />15,000 square feet for each tot and a width of 75 feet at the building line. Under t~:;reland'~? <br />Ordinances, a PUD that alters the minimum dimensional standards can be cons ~:but must <br />be approved by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources before the,~':~a~es the <br />development· The developer and City staff met with Tom Hovey from t,h,~e~"~,, who'~,:..,that <br />the development is far enough from the shoreline that the lot.size would~}~an issue· <br />re&cate that the DNR would want to ensure adequate ~eenspace, ~. rem~:d~ the develop~¥~¢:;~ <br />that the DNR would need to s~gn off on the final plan ~5~-?~!i ~:~ ' ,[i~, <br /> <br />Paul Kangas from Loucks and Assomates addressed the C~smon. t-f~ mdmated this ~s an <br />exciung project for the community. He highhghted the ~rous opea~.?eas orr the sketch plan <br /> <br />and the use of trails to connect the green space. Z~i~ated the ~r lots were chosen <br />because of sky-rocketing land values. He stated tba~'J~:;~y: differen~i~i~een the proposed ! <br />single family homes and the. association maintained d'ottag~i;:,~i~[~:~'~ie'¢}ferences. Al! of <br />the structures are detached single family homes on same siZ'~. This will maintain the <br />consistency of character throughoUt the development. He stated ficant ~umber of trees I <br />would be retained around the exterior of the development. He me~e4 ~heighborhood: <br /> concerns. He added t ~dead brush and <br /> <br /> meeting had been held and this <br /> thorny species of vegetation would the more des~rahf~Tiffees: He stated that <br /> each structure is shown as a ~ accurately~eflect the layout of the <br /> home when built. He added from the home, whereas <br /> the sketch plan shows them even with ~)Sn- indicated that due to the <br /> numerous greenspaces provided and the"'~'~' park :. northwest of the development, <br /> dedication <br /> requested. He mdmated the nmghbors who <br /> ~.jme,, are ex*'ecti"°-th~tT~t~ <br /> a~ended ~e ~f6~kfi:~n~.~ting had conce~ about ~e ~ails along ~e abusing prop~, as <br /> well as ~e .~ co~ecti~.. ~at would be:~a4~¢~7.?:~e issue of densiW ~sition w~ also <br /> mentione~¢¢,~e devetop~el ~at M~ ~,d~cape buffers proposed ~ey can meet ~e <br /> ~tent ~:~;densi, ~ansi~?ordin~ce. m 'f figas stated ~at additional developments have <br /> been ~mpF&te-~¢s~ng s¢~l~4O~4~h ~ ~e ~d ~ey have proven-xt c~ work. He added that <br /> run-off ponds~ beem'cre~,~e~.~velopers don t expect ~y run-off to occ~ except <br /> wi~ the deve[b~t. He ~er added ~at there would be one bouIev~d ~ough the <br />.,~7~el~ment, w~ch~,~ld be e~ced by l~dscaped entices. ~e developers .~e ve~ <br /> concem~:~out sav~ng,~t~when possible. He stated ~ere are ~ee wetl~d ~eas. Two <br /> will be filFed[~e tNrd on ~-~e~St s~de will be prese~ed in ~ts cu~ent state. <br /> <br /> Chai~erson N~indicate~s is not a public hemng, however Once ~e Co~ission has asked <br /> ·mr ques~on~ would briefly allow residents ~n a~end~ce to cogent. He stated ~e <br /> Co~ission ~ed more info~ation to make a good decisiom Chai~erson Nixt asked what <br />-~:~w:>had been do~at Sunfish L~e Estates and Chesmut ~dge to meet the 15,000 squ~e foot lot <br /> ~,~e reqm[~ents. <br /> <br /> Ph~21;Pl~er Tmdgeon ~dicated he did not ~ow~ <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 3 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />