Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Nixt asked if the City had the ability to enforce their ordinances even <br /> approves of smaller lot sizes. ' <br /> <br /> Pnnmpal ..... Planner Tmdgeon believes the C~ty has that right. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt asked that City Staff confirm this option. He also aske~i~ tat tb of <br /> having 15,000 square foot lots m the necessary areas of the development b~g re:uno <br /> <br /> Comm:ssmner Brauer asked for clarification on the results of the <br /> <br /> Chet Handson, representing the developer, indicated the D ostlfconcerned about the <br /> .~ . <br /> shorehne. He stated that the natural grade of the land time do~ not create any run..off <br /> except in extreme storms. He indicated the ponds cr.~i:,!i~:will~,~ accom~the same th~ng, ana' <br /> the DNR was happy about that. He added, that the D~ ~ants s ~i~eenspace, which <br /> ~,lan nrovktes. '" · ~¢~ ' · <br /> the <br /> sketch <br /> <br /> Principal Planner Trudgeon added that the DNR has taken ':~:~, consideration .that the <br /> development is far from the Ordmary H~gh Water point. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Brauer asked what,:~t o' ~e the DNR reqmr <br /> <br /> Principal Planner Trudgeon :n~licated 5~!ipercent, t%~ ~r~ison indicated they could <br /> meet those reqmrements. ~g~ '~? · <br /> <br /> Commissioner Jolms.o,~.:::~dmated that P~F Planner Tmdgeon seems to be m favor of <br /> approval, and ~g:,'for:'~:~Ore compelling ~0n to approve the Use of smaller lots besides the <br /> cost of land.~,~::~ :~::~. ~ :~::~:~ · <br /> <br /> Princi :',::P.!armer Trudgeoa::::ated he was of th/s development. He asked that the <br /> Cornm~s:on::~:eoris:der h~::~e:,,,,~ant ~y to develop. He stated that by consistently <br /> following the re~ireme~:§ 6~f~6~4i~ often end up .with the same developments over and <br /> over agmn, manY~ very umnsptred aevelopments. While :t :s uncomfortable to stray <br /> from <br />~:~:.~oseo:d:nances, :t :gsamettmes necessary to add creat:mty. This development has been corned <br /> as new'-gi;lsanizat:on wF/i~b~(,,:exn~,[ages sociahzmg within the development by bnngmg structures <br /> toward th~i~walk and s~:rather than the backyard.. <br /> <br /> Commissione/{SF~hnson i~Jmated that all of the things mentioned could be accoml~lished with <br /> lower density. :::~g stated he.needs more of a reason to approve the higher, density. <br /> <br />~i~:,;~hairperson:.~i,~t stated the Commission reviewed the ordinances and determined the density <br /> :~-i}~aximurn~..,}.~/~ single family homes. Now the Commms~on ~s being asked to forget those <br /> m~u~:1~n the name of good development. <br /> <br />Planning COmmission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />55 <br /> <br /> <br />