My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:30:14 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Principal Planner Trudgeon asked if the Commission would be in favor of the plan if'the <br />were 3.9 structures per acre rather than 4.4 as proposed. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated he would love it if that were the case, <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that if the City wants this k/nd <br />consider making some concessions. <br /> <br />~,to <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson reiterated that he needs a compelling <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas stated that New Urbanism means different <br />means narrower lots, smaller side lots and two car <br />park a boat or a trailer on the side, it also makes it <br />to-make that choice, and many will. <br /> <br /> As developers it <br />that means there is no space to <br /> Th~:~3meowner would need <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated the Commission cannot throw ordinances for everyone <br />who says land is expensive. <br /> <br /> *~.-~*..~ . ~'i3.' W- : ... .., ,;. ~ ~' , <br />Mr. Kangas asked ~f the developers .~.e_,.:',to:;~et the four umts per acre-~=~eq.m~:ement ~f the plan <br />woul~ be acceptable. <br /> <br />Co~issioner Brauer indicate~;'~ere ~}still the iss ~{(~'~i~}and road wide. He added <br />~at the Co~ss~on' ' couldn't gant <br /> <br />m. K~gas indicat~,:~e-:neighbors se~e~~d to the tralis ~d ~ked for ~e Co~ssions <br /> <br />Chat~ersO~ixt ~ked for e~lmatmn of ~e ~05way ~d~s. ~e su~ provtded says <br />some ~;~b~,50 leek w~le-o~er p~s of the ~2o~ ~nd~cate 45 to 55 feet. <br /> <br />Ci, En~nee;~7~9~~?~ :feet w~ scaled ~om ~e sketch drawing. He ~ows <br />now ~at ~ek i. nt~($*"is to have m~h~s of 50 feet. <br /> <br />~. ~.mdmated ~.~e..¢¢...~. 7,:~,~e requesting less ~ ~e. no~al 32 feet of paved are~ and as <br />h21e ~ 2~,;~e¢~ paved on ~e~f ~e private roads. ~s allows for p~ng on one s~de of ~e <br />smeet. He a6~.wtedge&,~s slows down ~affic, but stated ~at was ~e intent. <br /> <br />Chm~erson ~ asked ~f ~e developers beheved ~at no s~dewalk ~d smaller s~eets would <br /> <br />Ch~on Nixt asked if sixteen feet would provide safe p~sage for emergency vehcles. <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.