|
!
<br />I City Engineer Jankowsld stated it however he did not check the intersection
<br /> would,
<br /> ensure vehicles could properly mm. He indicated parking restrictions would he ne!
<br /> ensure parking on. only one side of the street
<br />
<br /> Commissioner Johnson asked if the City Engineer had any fundamental is foot
<br />I paved road
<br /> City Engineer Jankowski' indicated there were other 24-foot streets ~s' '
<br />
<br /> Mr. Kangas added that there would be many ws~tor park/ng~..~es thr~out the assomatmn
<br /> area where the private, narrower streets are proposed. He i~~ that a S~ilar development in
<br />I Stillwater has 24-foot streets and they function fin
<br /> many
<br />
<br /> Cornmms~oner Johnson asked what Ramsey s pos~t~o~. :A~s or~:~ate ro
<br />
<br /> Principal' Planner Trudgeon stated a public thru street ~s needed~' g completely through the
<br /> development, which isn't showing on this sketch. He added private ~oad is against
<br /> ordinance and would reqmre a variance,
<br />
<br /> I Chin erson N~xt ~n&cated ~t wout~i!~,ia s e to plan to make tti~'hd Cubhc
<br />
<br /> Mr. Kangas re&cared ~t would requu:e lmus. e setback ~pnm~}i~5~i;~ast s~de of the road.
<br />
<br /> Chatrperson N~xt asked for an explanat~or/~sh,)~ages.
<br />
<br /> · . ,~::,~,i:;:,::~'(?,,,,~. ,.~- . .... .....
<br /> I Mr. Kangas m¢~//l~ed,ihe:i.use of the word c~e mtterent~ates between assomatmn mamtmned
<br /> and owner ~-.~;-tamed. ~:,'lots are ~dent~c~ ~sther single-family lots, as are the home
<br />
<br /> tzonum;smone~,0nnson a~j~ea~.~_o,~,~.,n ,.,e, xpl~,~ ozme pnvam anve .
<br />
<br /> M,r.. Kangas tndtc~¢d~;it would be 24 leer, w~th no right-or-way. Eubhc roads requtre 25 teet on
<br /> .,ncd,}'e~'S~de for rtght-o~..~,.
<br />
<br /> I ..~.~?' ""~77,~ ~,, ~¢~7¢~ --
<br /> ,~ Comm~ss~-o~Z~.Johnson stat/e~.:!~ would consider the variance to the setback requirements tf the
<br /> ~ developers VC,.'~.~to make;~t~ pubhc road. · ·
<br />
<br /> ~.~.m:, Chmrperson N~menttoned~,,~,~. there ts also a requirement for new developments, to have a stdewalk
<br /> ~¢~:~ on one stde. ~xrperson Ntxt asked zf the developers feel they can bmld all the umts w~thin 50-
<br /> · {:}:.i?.:-...foot lot hne,4~'-fs __
<br /> . "¥75, ..,~';%g' . ..... . ·
<br /> ~:;Ka.a.g~' mdmated 50 feet ~s the nummum lot wldhll, most are 52 feet wide or more, . and. they
<br />· are,',,.~¢~)rtableZ.:.:: with their ability to build within that. He added that they would expect
<br /> s~ant covenants within the development addressing outbuildings, fences, landscaping, etc.
<br />
<br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003
<br /> Page 6 of 10
<br />
<br />57
<br />
<br />
<br />
|