Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003

Home

He stated they would keep the same style home from bein, built next to each other and home color as well. 4~?' "":%~i~: Chai~erson Nixt asked about the enviromental review. ~ Pnnmpat Pl~er Tmdgeon m&cated they will .be reqmred to keep ~ mucb~a~ral vegef~ as possible'. ~ey would not be allowed to cle~ cut ~ees ~om the propd~ey also ...... · · '~:~U~ ~ momtor sod companbflz~ ~d reqmre a tec~cal review to ensgm ~e :~khed product ~i~< ~. Kangas stated the nmghbors who a~ended ~e mee~n~ a concern w~th ~e road stubs. ~ey &d not want ~e roads to go all ~e way t~ou~. ,~,¢/**' Chmmerson N]xt m&cated ~at ~om a pl~ng p~Epeeti~'~ Co~~7ould want ~em co~ected. He would w~t to see the traffic analisis before ~:a~si S redd~ed. Co~ssioner V~ Scoy stated he had a concern about ge~g ~}~:~cks ~0~gh on 24 foot paved roads. . '~:¢~2~ Co~ms~oner Jonson stated C!.¢::,En~n /s~ w~ comfona~w~th the 24 feet, to which Ciw En~neer J~ows~7~d~. ':~f" ' Phncipal PI~ Tmdgeon indicated ~e~e .so proposed development ~d would be consulted with ~gher Chaicerson Ni~};~f~d;'~p!~ says int~o~Eee prese~ation would be difficult. He ~ked ~at the develoPe~6';k wf~ ~}Staff to see m~.iz~ee prese~ation. · · ;7:: ~=;~' ~ Z · ~.~ P~c~at':.~er Tmdgeon:,md~cated there w~ be a ~ee presemaUon plan at the prel2ina~ ~. Kang~ adde&::~t the developers would be h~dlmg the l~dscape on ~e b0ulev~ds, ~d .~<,~:mamtmn ~mal~con~ol on l~dscap~ng prowded by ~e md~wdual o~ers. . . ~.~-~. , ~L~E~-'~;C~~ ...... Chm~ersO~xt asked ho~5~e developer feels about el~at~ng ~e ~mls neXt to ~e abusing ~. K~gas sta¢~ ~ey don't w~t to do somet~g ~e residents don't w~t, ~d they would not get credit for if~ite~s,~? of pink dedication ~ay. L~~gor, 6194 146t~ Avenue, stated he Was concerned wi~ the densi, issue.. Hestated t~s d~s~ion on densi~ h~ been going on for several ye~s, ~d was previously brought before ~e · ' Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 Page 7 of 10