My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:30:14 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />Commission with a request to make it medium density. The Commission at that t/me <br />City Council, voted to leave the property as is rather than change the density <br />the current developers first talked about obtaining the property it was discussed <br />PUD is four units per acre. They would need to remove 14 units to be <br />requirements. He asked the developer if that would make or break the deal. <br /> <br /> A <br />PUD <br /> <br />Todd Bierstad, owner of Todd Allen Homes, responded that he wasn't <br />would affect the bottom line. If the decision by the City says they <br />lots they would re-do the math and see if it still, makes sense. He <br />it if necessary. <br /> <br />losing' 15 <br /> the <br /> .g to. look at <br /> <br />Mr. Raygor Stated the general consensus of the nei <br />layouts and home styles. He stated some of the <br />some didn't want it to connect with Tungsten, but <br />was glad they were using individual units rather than twin <br />concerned about the density. He stated if the deVelopers can' <br />will be happy. <br /> <br />that <br />to <br /> <br /> like the architecture. <br /> the walldng Path, <br />He added he <br />but he i~ still <br />within a P~uD, everyone <br /> <br />Steve Thurlen, 14700 a <br />trail behind the houses is not <br />up the sidewalk in fron/of <br />stated density transition is also a <br />adjoining properties. He stated there <br />He appreciates that they want to save <br />the edges of the-~-~ ~-P~':~:~?'~F~e'added there <br />Comprehensive.~an~?!~f:~ creates hard <br /> <br />Sandy B~,~: 6001 146th ~nue NW, <br />maint~i~ottages. She s~a that if the <br /> <br />The lots <br />be <br /> <br />is an issue for the S. He stated the <br />already spends time cleaning <br />back uire the same~ He <br /> the back yards of the <br /> to 10,800 square foot lots, <br /> &~ ~s a lot of work needed along <br /> at the meeting about trying to change the <br /> <br />~was a need to have two entrm3., ces to the <br />didn't have two entrances it would save <br /> <br />Chairperson <br /> <br />that there was discussion about making that. private drive a public <br /> <br />'l <br /> <br /> Ms. ked if the the other end was okay. <br /> <br /> Chairperson a public street could end in a cul-de-sac if all the requirements, were <br /> met. He suggeSte~l Ms. Bu~s~ck meet w~ the developer ~f she h~ sug~es~ons. <br /> <br />".,,,~5;~nc Zache ~ated he w~ not a neighbor, but had a~ended ~e neighborhood meetmg. He <br />'~*~ted seue~its per acre would be 196 udts. If the.Co~ssion ch~ges ~e Comprehensive <br />P~.'~eTcwould open themselves to ~at poss~b~h~. He questioned the mab~h~ of ~e developer <br />to hh~er Mr. Raygor's question. He added ~at geeing emergency people b'e~een the homes <br />~l~/be difficult with only a ten-foot sep~ation. He stated ~e m~ket plus show the homes <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br />5O <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.