My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:29:20 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:23:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/07/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />! <br />! <br />! <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that they have a five-year conditional use <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec requested that staff discuss the complaint with the property owner. ??:": <br /> <br />~. Hamilton noted that it was his recollection that the conditional use pem~';~ u~'~0~renewal <br /> <br />Co~uniW Development Director Frolik replied that she would re~e~ch ~at"~o~ation. <br /> <br />Winslow Holasek, ·1159 Andov~ Boulevard, ~dover, stated ~;~e o~ prope~ on the south <br />side of the railroad ~acks and the no~ side of Highway g~O?He stated that the prop~ owners <br />have expressed their opinion regarding the pond that W~'Placed i~ ~e bus,ess p~k and <br />taxes they are being ch~ged for the outlet of that:~p~d. He st~ ~at their taxes ~e so' <br />unbearable and their City share of the taxes is high~;th~fi~:~.other ta~:'~';~:~reviously ~e prope~ <br />owners had asked that eider the Ci~ drop the sto~ sew~ or ::pU~ch%'e their prope~. At <br />that time, the Council directed the Ci~ Admiffis~ator to m'eet:~}~ith the pr0pe~ owners to <br />discuss if there was any interest in selling their prop~ to ~e ~:~;~ ~e prop~ o~ers did <br />receive a letter ~om the Ci~ Admiffistrator requesting ~at ~ey dOn~ct the ~ if ~ey were <br />interested in selling their prope~. ~..Holasek presented a copy of ~,:~le~e~¥or their review. <br />He requested individual responses ~0m each of,,~e 'Councilmembers if they:had received a copy <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that the Council reCeived a,,c.~py of~ele2erin thek weekly update packet <br /> <br />Mr. Holasek inquked if each Councilmember had seen a copy of the le~er. <br /> <br />Mayor Garnet replied that the leuer was includ~ed ~:~ Council's wee~y update. <br />Mr. Holasek stated that ~ a result of the <br />Administrator. <br /> <br />were. <br /> <br /> property owners did meet with the City <br />He inquired 'if the Cotln~iF~as aware of what the property owner's responses <br /> <br />city Attorney Goodrich'noted that this was not a cross-examination. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that Mr; ,Holasek can review the records. Any direction by the Council has <br />to be done by a motion. : , <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the point of citizen input is for a citizen to ~ve input and than <br />in the future staff or Council will respond. <br /> <br />Mr. Holasek stated that he wants to know in writing what each Councilmember was told in <br />regards to the conversations the property owners had with the City Administrator. <br /> <br />City Council/October 22, 2002 <br /> Page 3 of 35 <br /> <br />P123 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.