Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I ' <br /> <br />letter dated October 16, 2002, and the applicant entering into a development permit with the City <br />of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Kur~i?~Hbndriks~r~} <br />Anderson, and Zimmennan. Voting No: None. - ~'~':~.;7~II?I'' <br /> :¢:;,':,t''~ .... :~'~2' , <br /> <br />Case #10: Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Villas of Mekfl~g point: e~g,of <br /> Allstate Development, LLC ' ~'~:~ ' ':~%~.;~. '::~'~ii~!?: <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that .Allstate Development:tisL~ ha~%plied for preliminary'"" (i~:~:!? <br />plat approval for a townhome development. The prope~:~?;¢~nerally located 'in the triangUlar <br />area formed by the intersection of Nowthen Blvd, Su~ii" Lake Blvd., and Alpine Dr. The???~' <br />Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan fo[::/~:d?Property at~!'i~ June 6, 2002 meeting. <br />The sketch plan showed a total of 157 townhouse ~S '(fi~Prised .gf~unit and sixteenrpnit <br />townhome buildings). The preliminary plat shows the 'fi~St:.p~¢'~of:~he development and <br />consists of 19 two-unit townhome buildings and 6 single-famii:-Y!~ts for a total of 44 housing <br />units. The City Council tabled action on the preliminary plat at th~ili~eptember 2~ 2002 and the <br />October 8 2002 meetin s The relimin lat is bein brou ht b~Cl(for the~O~ober 29, 9002 <br /> , g . p ~ dry p g g :. ~.:~:: _. _ <br />meetin The 190 da s allowed b the";C~ to make a decision on the l~¢t~,mi~ plat ex ires on <br /> g. - y Y ~ W P <br />November 6, 2002. On October ~':20.02~ th~':~j~: Council tabled action..?fi;:{he preliminary plat <br />in order see the following itemg} ;t) Cbncept pihh:~fhat shows how the l~8?~nit townhomes would <br />be laid out in relation to the ~b-unit {6Wnhomes,. 2'~:::;~etch plan showing, in case the 16-unit <br />townhomes are not allowed, altemativ6 :{ownhome:ibUildifigs: ~'~ilrhe east, 3) traffic generation' <br />study, 4) langUage regarding the constmCfiOn~of:~he sanita~;ge-"Wer trunk line and the financial <br />responsibilities of the City and develope~ ~'~iSbnstructing ~ trunk line. In response to the <br />tabling moti on on OctOber 3t~, staff had the f0I~owing information: <br /> <br />· The con~:e~t plans shoWlhg the 16-unit to¢:~o~:;} and another alternative are included with <br /> the case for your information.. <br /> <br /> The traffic §enerati6n~'~fiai~Sis '~a~':ih:~i~bd With the case. The traffic generation report was <br /> prepared by James Johnson P.E. with Hakanson Anderson Associates. Exhibit H and I of the <br /> report illustrate the total daily trips and peak hourly trips onto the arterial roads adjacent to <br /> the Proposed subdi¢ision <br /> <br /> In addition, the report.Upd~{es a previous report prepared on May 14, 2002 which examined <br /> cumulative, traffic impacts of Evergreen Point, Alpine Meadows, Wildlife Sanctuary 2~a <br /> Addition, and Sunflower Ridge. The cumulative effects of the above mentioned subdivisions <br /> along with .the additional units associated with Villas of Meadow Point were evaluated for its <br /> impact on the three major intersections which include TH 47 and Alpine Dr., CSAH 5 and <br /> Alpine DrY, and CR 57 and Alpine Dr. Each of these intersections currently operates at a <br /> · high level of service, even during the AM and PM peaks. The additional traffic generated <br /> from the surrounding developments are not expected to deteriorate the level of service of the <br /> intersections after full build-out. <br /> <br />City Council/October 22, 2002 <br /> Page 25 of 35 <br /> <br />P145 <br /> <br /> <br />