My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 07/28/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2026
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 07/28/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2026 3:15:11 PM
Creation date
7/28/2026 9:26:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
07/28/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE IMPACT OF RESPONSIBLE BIDDER ORDINANCES ON UNION CONTRACTORS IN ILLINOIS AND INDIANA <br />The Impact of 11 New RBOs on Market Share Outcomes <br />The data utilized in this research was collected by the Indiana, Illinois, Iowa Foundation for Fair <br />Contracting, a nonprofit labor-management organization (III FFC, 2021). The III FFC collects project data <br />for 14 northern Indiana counties and 25 northern Illinois counties using bid software programs such as <br />ConstructConnect and Dodge Data & Analytics as well as through public bid lettings and public documents. <br />All projects in their proprietary reports include the date of the bid letting, the county of the project, the <br />awarding agency, bid information, the union (or signatory) status of each bidder, and whether the project <br />was covered by a local responsible bidder ordinance (RBO). <br />This study includes project bid data from January 2018 through June 2021. The 42 months represent the <br />period of analysis. Since 2019, there have been 16 RBOs passed in Illinois and Indiana. One city —the City <br />of Kewanee, IL —had a different RBO in effect starting in 2007. Four others, including two in Indiana and <br />two in Illinois, did not have a project built either before or after passage of the RBO during the period of <br />analysis. These four jurisdictions include a school district, library district, village, and forest preserve. It is <br />not possible to ascertain the effect of adopting an RBO in these four jurisdictions because there is not a <br />clear before -and -after picture. This leaves 11 jurisdictions with project bid data both before their RBOs <br />were passed and after their RBOs went into effect —five in Illinois and six in Indiana. The full dataset <br />includes 145 public projects involving the operating engineers craft, including 94 prior to passage of the <br />local RBOs and 51 after passage. <br />Figure 2 presents summary statistics for all the projects awarded by these 11 local government <br />jurisdictions in Illinois and Indiana between the beginning of January 2018 and the end of June 2021. On <br />the projects that were awarded prior to passage of the local RBOs, union contractors won 76.6 percent of <br />the projects and the union market share was 87.1 percent. By contrast, after RBOs were enacted and <br />applied on projects funded by these same jurisdictions, union contractors were awarded 90.2 percent of <br />the projects and the union market share totaled 97.9 percent. Accordingly, the union win rate was 13.6 <br />percent higher and the union market share was 10.8 percent higher on the post-RBO projects than on the <br />pre-RBO projects. This reveals that local businesses employing union construction workers are more <br />significantly likely to be responsible contractors with proven track records of success than nonunion firms <br />in the region. Bid competition was essentially unchanged, with about three and half contractors <br />submitting bids on public projects regardless of whether or not they were covered by RBOs. <br />FIGURE 2: CHANGE IN UNION WIN SHARE AND UNION MARKET SHARE IN 11 ILLINOIS AND INDIANA JURISDICTIONS THAT <br />HAVE PASSED RBOS SINCE 2019, WITH BEFORE -AND -AFTER DATA FROM JAN. 2018 THROUGH JUNE 2021 <br />Column 11 Jurisdictions with Data Math <br />Before -and -After <br />Before After RBO <br />RBOs RBOs Difference <br />A Number of Projects <br />B Number of Bids <br />C Bids Per Project <br />D Value of All Projects <br />E Projects Awarded to Unions <br />F Union Win Share <br />G Value of Projects Awarded to Unions <br />H Union Market Share <br />94 <br />342 <br />B _ A 3.6 <br />$66,749,035.72 <br />72 <br />E+A 76.6% <br />$58,154,683.02 <br />G+D 87.1% <br />51 <br />174 <br />3.4 <br />$56,246,096.58 <br />46 <br />90.2% <br />$55,087,053.28 <br />97.9 <br />-0.2 <br />+13.6% <br />+10.8% <br />Source: Authors' analysis of project bid data from the Indiana, Illinois, Iowa Foundation for Fair Contracting (III FFC, 2021). For <br />more, see Table B, Table C, and Table D in the Appendix. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.