Laserfiche WebLink
City Engineer Olson replied that it would be staffs recommendation that the City cap how much <br />area one telecommunication company can use. He felt that ¼ of the are would be adequate. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he liked the idea of having the equipment stored in the inside of the <br />building. He felt that once the cost of the mezzanine is paid for then the remaining funds <br />collected should be placed into the Park Trust fund. He requested that staff verify where the <br />costs would come from to build the mezzanine, because he does not utility costs to go up because <br />the mezzanine was constructed if the funds were taken from the utility fund. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen inquired if staff was assured that the mezzanine is suitable for use <br />by carriers such as Verizon. He inquired if there would be any humidity problems with storing <br />the equipment inside. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that the telecommunication companies would have to build a <br />climate-controlled room for the equipment. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler noted that staff is looking to utilize the space on the <br />lower lever for storage of Public Works equipment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if any of the engineering firms have anyone on staff that <br />would be able to inform the City of the needs and requirement for placing this type of equipment <br />inside the base of the water tower. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that staff has discussed the issue with ACE Engineering and <br />they have indicated that they are constructing mezzanines in many of their towers for this <br />purpose. He noted that staff could request a list of where this has been done. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to recommend that the City <br />Council enter into the contract with CBI, Inc. and AEC Engineering contingent upon Verizon, <br />Inc. entering into a contract with the City to pay the proportional cost of their usage and direct <br />staff to research further information regarding the feasibility of telecommunication equipment <br />being located on a mezzanine level. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec and Councilmembers Anderson, Hendriksen, and <br />Kurak. VotingNo: None. <br /> <br />Case #4: Public vs. Private Streets <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson stated that section 9.50.30 of the current City Code states, "Private streets <br />shall not be approved. All proposed streets shown on the plat shall be offered for dedication as <br />public streets." This section of the City code was rewritten in 1990. Since the writing of this <br />code there has been a number of exceptions to this rule: Rum River Hills Townhomes-Final Plat <br />Approval February 28, 1995; Sunfish Ponds-Final Plat Approval, June 10, 1997; Mallard Ponds- <br />Final Plat Approval June 13, 2000; Neon Street near 143''d Avenue NW (common access to four <br />single family lots); Blue Velvet Lane; Front road between SuperAmercia and Landmark Bank <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/August 21, 2001 <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />