Laserfiche WebLink
Existing >600-Foot Streets 1 Are They Actually Comparable? <br />THE QUESTION <br />The existence of Ramsey streets longer than 600 feet does not, by itself, establish that the current standard is <br />unnecessary. Before existing long streets are used as precedent for repeal, the relevant question is whether they were <br />approved and operate under conditions comparable to what repeal would allow in future subdivisions. <br />BOWERS DRIVE <br />Ramsey has described Bowers as its longest dead-end street with a single access point. Fire, Police and Public Works later <br />supported providing another connection. Fire called the connection an "important and vital roadway connection for Public <br />Safety"; Police said it would increase the ability to quickly render aid; Public Works specifically identified the concern of a "long <br />cul-de-sac road with only a single access point." <br />RIVERSTONE SOUTH 6TH — -640 FEET <br />In 2025, Fire did not object to the approximately 40-foot overage and two hydrants were proposed. Ramsey nevertheless required a <br />formal variance and findings. This demonstrates that a modern longer cul-de-sac could be accommodated through an exception <br />without eliminating the underlying 600-foot benchmark. <br />LONGER CUL-DE-SACS WITH CITY WATER <br />In a written response received during this review, a Ramsey official familiar with utilities stated that longer cul-de-sacs exceeding <br />600 feet with City services are looped for better water quality. That means at least some existing long streets may contain <br />utility -system mitigation that is not apparent from road length alone. <br />THE COMPARABILITY TEST <br />Before existing >600-foot streets are treated as evidence supporting repeal, identify for each one: <br />• permanent vs. temporary/future-through street; <br />• centerline length and homes served; <br />• year and standards under which it was approved; <br />• whether a length variance was required; <br />• hydranted vs. non-hydranted; <br />• looped vs. dead-end water main; <br />• secondary/emergency access or secured future connection; <br />• documented Fire, Police, Engineering or Public Works conditions/concerns. <br />WHY IT MATTERS <br />If many existing >600-foot streets required variances, contain looped utilities, have hydrants or secondary/future <br />access, predate modern standards, or later generated access concerns, then their existence may support the value of <br />an exception process more than it supports eliminating the underlying objective standard. <br />Kecora status: rtamseys puoucry inaexea recoras ao not expose a complete taoie or au cui-ae-sacs wrtn centerune iengms. 1 pis section rnererore goes <br />not claim to inventory every >600-foot street; it identifies documented examples and the conditions needed for a valid comparison. <br />Ramsey Bowers Drive nirhlic-safety record <br />Ramsey Resolution 25-026 — Riverstone South 6th <br />Ramsey subdivision / plat requirements <br />Ramsey existing >600-foot streets I comparability <br />