Laserfiche WebLink
PW CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS AT <br />144TM LANE AND TUNGSTEN WAY <br />By: Steven J. Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />This case was originally placed on the November 17, 1998 Road and Bridge Committee <br />agenda, however the petitioner could not be present. On November 4, 1998, the City <br />received a letter from Shelly Peterson of 6140 - 144th Lane NW, requesting that stop <br />signs be installed at the intersection of 144th Lane and Tungsten Way. Her letter is <br />attached to this case. In accordance with the policy for processing such requests, the staff <br />traffic review committee consisting of the Police Chief, the Director of Public Works, <br />and the City Engineer, met to review the intersection on Friday, November 13, 1998. <br />Attached is a report on the conditions observed and the accident history background and <br />the staff's recommendation. <br /> <br />Site Distance: The intersection was viewed for site distance from all four approaches. <br />Although Tungsten Street has a moderate downward grade proceeding to the north, it was <br />observed that the limiting factors for sight distances are the homes on all four comers of <br />the intersection. This leads to the conclusion that the sight distances are no poorer at this <br />intersection than any randomly chosen intersection in the sewer and water district which <br />have similar structure setbacks. <br /> <br />Accident History.: A review of the accident history for the five year period, including <br />1993 through 1997, shows one accident at this intersection which occurred in 1995, <br />involving a single vehicle which left the roadway. This accident was not the result of <br />failure to yield the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Traffic Counts: One function of a stop sign is to assign right-of-way to main street over <br />lesser-traveled streets. The petitioner's letter points out that the primary road is not clear. <br />Traffic counts were taken by visual observation on Monday, November 16, 1998, from <br />3:45 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. and Monday, November 23, from 4:45 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. This <br />has been shown by other studies to be peak afternoon traffic periods for this <br />neighborhood. There was a total of 38 vehicles (and one bicycle) through this <br />intersection over a two hour, 15 minute period, or an average of one vehicle every three <br />minutes and 33 seconds. Traffic volumes of this magnitude have a low probability of <br />having two or more vehicles entering the intersection simultaneously. However, when <br />such events do occur, it is a better practice to have each motorist assume responsibility <br />for proceeding safely through the intersection, rather than to rely on a stop sign which <br />one of the approaching motorists may be in the habit of observing with some degree of <br />laxity. <br /> <br />Speed Assessment: The petitioner's letter references high speed through the intersection. <br />A speed study has been scheduled for the week of December 7, 1998, but is not available <br /> <br /> <br />