09/10/98 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

BOARD BUSINESS Case #1: Request for a Variance to Height Restrictions for a Senior Housing Facility; Case of City of Ramsey and Anoka County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (continuation) Zoning Administrator Frolik explained that Fire Chief Dean Kapler expressed concerns at the public hearing on September 1, 1998, with regard to the building's fire safety, and therefore, the case discussion was tabled until representatives of Dunbar Development Corporation could be available for comment. She introduced representatives from Dunbar and their architectural firm. She also affirmed that the dry sprinkler system discussed at the September 1 meeting is standard for this building. Fire Chief Dean Kapler stated he discussed his concerns with the architect, John Rova, on September 4 and he has more than adequately covered those points of concern. A memorandum outlining this conversation and addressing the sprinkler system and attic draft stops is attached to these minutes. Tom Dillon, Dunbar Development Corporation, explained that the fire plans were going to be submitted at the time of the building permit application but the sprinkler system was always in the plan. Ms. Frolik asked Mr. Dillon to address the question of an alternative flat roof. Mr. Dillon stated that general experience is that flat roofs are more expensive, and a dry-charge system satisfies safety concerns for the peaked roof. Board Member Anderson questioned the Fire Chief as to whether he had any reservations about adequate fire protection of this building. Mr. Kapler replied that he would continue to push for plans to purchase an aerial truck, however, he was satisfied with the measures taken at this point to equip the building in the safest way to be compatible with the Fire Department's current equipment. He stated this building was very different from the Comfort Inn in that it has no common attic and each room has fire stops on the ceiling. Board Member Jensen summarized that nothing has changed with the building height, and noted that on the garage end, it is even higher. Mr. Kapler stated that the windows on the garage end are not the only windows to those units and rescue would occur from windows that are more easily accessible. Mr. Rova explained that those units are two-bedroom units and the bedroom windows are on the opposite end of the garage. The Board of Adjustment proceeded to review the Findings of Fact. Board of Adjustment/September 10, 1998 Page 2 of 4