My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/05/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/05/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:41:32 AM
Creation date
3/30/2007 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/05/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />employ EcoCheck to monitor operations, septic tanks, and water quality and functiouality, The <br />City will require a copy of a utility operating agreemeut between EcoCheck and the developer to <br />ensure the consistent maintenance and monitoring of the system. Mr. Trudgeon indicated there <br />was also an issue regarding the sprinkling 'system. The applicant has met with the Fire <br />Department several times and submitted a plan that shows to be adequate for what is being <br />proposed. There was also the issue of the road extension to Alpine Drive. The:final plat now <br />indicates the platting and construction of 156'" Avenue to Alpine Drive that will serve the <br />proposed development Mr. Trudgeon advised staff recommends approval of the fmal plat and <br />site plan contingent upon compliance with the City Staff Review Letter specifically addressing <br />the items included in the staff report. <br /> <br />Mr. Mike Walz, General Contractor representing Northfork Office Condos, stated the fourth <br />bullet point under Drainage and Grading in the Staff Review Letter requires a sidewalk to be <br />installed along 156'" Avenue from Alpine Drive to the west line of the plat. This requirement <br />had never been discussed previously, and was just brought to his attention seven days ago: He <br />stated this requirement would add about $8,000 to t4e project cost and he requests that it be <br />removed. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if the proposed sidewalk will connect to another area. <br /> <br />Mr. Walz stated there is currently no sidewalk along Alpine Drive and he finds this sidewalk <br />pointless; <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig indicated the Economic Development Authority has had discussions <br />regarding trails being included in industrial parks, He noted his building in the City of Anok. is <br />required to have a sidewalk and it is an amenity, but it is in a larger space than this development. <br />It has been the City's intention to have connecting trails; he could advocate for a trail here, but <br />does not understand the purpose for a sidewalk. . <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec suggested requiring an easement to be provided for a future trail. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon explained it was staff's perception that the <br />connection of trails needs to start at some point. He agrees at this point this sidewalk would not <br />go anywhere, but the first trails built in the City did not go anywhere either. He stands behind <br />the recommendation, but it is the Council's decision to make. The sidewalk is being proposed <br />along the north side of 156'" Avenue and would end at the City of Elk River; the important link is <br />to Alpine Drive. <br /> <br />MI. Walz stated this sidewalk would not go to any restaurants or amenities, and there are no <br />residential areas to walk from or to. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook explained this sidewalk. would not lead anywhere now, but there would <br />likely be connectivity down Alpine Drive as other properties start to develop. There are places <br />similar to this that now have trail connections or sidewalks going through them, which would <br />never have happened if the first developers had not been required to put in sidewalks. <br /> <br />City Council J December 28, 2006 <br />Page 19 of26 <br /> <br />P31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.