Laserfiche WebLink
access to these parks is also a need. Future growth in these areas will demand further park <br />attention, which can be determined by an in-depth study. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib added that firm policies and plans need to be in place so as to provide direction for <br />future park development. A Comprehensive Plan could address all park sites and populations <br />served, and must then be followed. This type of implementation strategy could be used as a <br />marketing tool in appealing to potential residents and businesses. <br /> <br />Planning Commissioner Deemer asked if the State ever turns over fully developed park land to the <br />city, such as wayside rests and so on. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib was not sure about this. He stated the Mississippi River Corridor may become an <br />independent trail, but there is opposition to this. The public's wishes will need to be heard. <br /> <br />Mr. Boos added that PUDs could also help to preserve land. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib stated that the documents he handout out address land that falls within developing <br />rural areas. He said that if development is close to the Greenway Corridor (i.e. Trott Brook), all <br />available land must be sought so as to continue to corridor. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Johns asked if this conserved land could be developed into trails. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib answered that yes, land trusts can be initiated, and are tax-deferred. An ordinance <br />overlay may have to be developed as well, as developers come in and delineate wetlands. He <br />added that natural resources could help to creme an identity for Ramsey that the public can be <br />proud of. This type of identification can also appeal to potential investors. Woodbury was <br />successful in this kind of endeavor. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib asked the Commission to look at the provided documentation and give feedback. <br /> <br />Mr. Boos stated that parkway routes need to be developed to add beauty and identity for Ramsey, <br />as well as for pedestrian and bicycle transportation. He asked if Commission input is required <br />before construction and maintenance issues are talked about in the plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib replied that all of these costs should be looked at. Development of the entire urban <br />area needs to be considered. He added that present community facilities such as Bunker Hills <br />could provide some further ideas. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib went on to say that light-rail transportation will also impact the development in the <br />town center area, and could increase the City's marketability. <br /> <br />Mr. Boos stated the next regular park meeting is scheduled for July 9. He asked Mr. Scheib if the <br />revised draft would be completed by then. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib answered that yes, it will. <br /> <br /> Park and Recreation Commission/June 11, 1998 <br /> Page 5 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />