Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tAr. Ruehle explained Mr. Boike had a purchase agreement on his property previously that fell <br />through. If this deal does not move forward it would be likely Mr. Boike would come forw d <br />with a proposal for some type of development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she had that c <br />no matter how it is looked at the entire property is <br />other parcels. It would be important to highlight <br /> <br /> <br />erty is that <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted the possibility of reverse condemnation if this purchase doe <br />forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey pointed out that the appraised value in a reverse co <br />would be about one million more than what is being prese d. <br /> <br />Jv1r. Ruehle stated one thing that should be noted as <br />the south and other areas coming to the table if <br />be any RALF funds remaining to do anything s <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he understand <br />He asked who will put up the $1.2 mill' <br />which are not guaranteed, are not avai <br /> <br />ds from one project. <br />lth tills and the funds, <br /> <br />Berg has informed her that <br />no deal with the County, The <br />they will receive the $1.2 million. <br />nothing to go forward with. Two <br />s to the Metropolitan Council for <br />officially map e property; 2) a lelter stating the City <br />the RALF funds currently in the pipeline for the Bialon <br /> <br />elude the following on the March 27,2007 City <br /> <br />of the switch in RALF funding from the Bialon <br /> <br />---7 <br /> <br />Associate ted DPM Investments has submitted a preliminary plat, <br />Comprehensiv ent and rezoning application to develop 6 twinhomes (3 two-unit <br />buildings) on the of Super Bowl on Ebony Street_ The applicant went before the <br />Planning CommissiOI preliminary plat review last September, 2006. Since that time. the <br />preliminary plat has been before the Council for consideration at a worksession on October 10. <br />2006, and regular Council meetings on November 14, 2006, December 28, 2006 and January 9, <br />2007. The primary reason for the delay has been the consideration of new elevations for the <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / March 20, 2007 <br />Page 5 ofl3 <br /> <br />-117- <br />