My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:17:54 AM
Creation date
4/6/2007 10:24:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />twinhome buildings. Ms. Dalnes stated the submitted elevations meet the R-2 Residential <br />architectural requirements, subject to verification of the brick and color information at the <br />building permit review. However. because the 'applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment and Rezoning. the City has an opportunity to request additional improvements to the <br />design. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Dalnes reviewed that on January 9th, the City Council tabled the plat and <br />directed the applicant to prepare additional revised elevations to be brought before Council at a <br />worksession, and to have an architect available at that m: . was staffs interpretation of <br />Council direction that the applicant was to make substan rior to the worksession. <br />The applicant has submitted another elevation whi er versions. though a 2nd <br />~,,' <br />style of dormer has been added and some col e two sides have been <br />included. Council is requested to provide direc . . nal revisions <br />to the elevations are required. <br /> <br />The following comments were made <br />previously requested by Council: <br />. Councilmember Elvig indicated <br />in submittal #3. <br />. Mr_ Murphy explained the 10 <br />trees on the site. Counc' <br />information on the imp <br />Murphy indicated the <br />Dalnes indicated the <br />the goal of stagge . <br />. Councilmember Je <br />se the <br />ested <br />surfac <br /> <br /> <br />buildings that was <br /> <br />Council reviewed the submitted elevations for Ebo <br />Dan Murphy. <br /> <br />'11 affect the ability to save <br />d Council be provided with <br />on the tree preservation plan. Mr. <br />ntory of the site. Associate Planner <br />ize the loss of trees while achieving <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />Co <br />camp <br />Comprehe <br />development <br /> <br />ite is in his ward. The number one issue he heard during his <br />not be more townhomes. He will not vote in favor of this <br />t, as there are too many townhomes in this area and this <br /> <br />MI. Murphy replied is a difference between a twinhome and townhome; a tvvinhome has a <br />different appeal than a typical multi-unit townhome. He attended the Planning Commission <br />meetings where those concerns were raised by the neighbors. A lot of the concerns had to do <br />with income,_ race, and things he does not believe are. appropriate concerns for what they are <br /> <br />City Council Work Session I March 20, 2007 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />-118- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.