My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:17:54 AM
Creation date
4/6/2007 10:24:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />trying to do with this site, The price point for these twin homes will be $275,000 to $285,000, <br />likely close to $300,000 with options and amenities. The use of this land does not have real <br />value in a single family or business use, and with the municipal water that was put through the <br />owner of the property is now paying his assessments and taxes as if this parcei is improved <br />without the ability to move fOl'VVard and do anything with it. <br /> <br />Councilmernber Dehen stated he appreciates J\.1r. Murphy's comments, but he will not vote in <br />favor of this given there was such vehement opposition during his campaign and the opposition <br />from the neighbors reflected in the minutes. <br /> <br /> <br />ssociation involved with <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson verified with Mr. Murphy <br />the development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen expressed concern <br />how the buildings will appear as a group with <br />elevation being provided. <br /> <br />arance of <br />a full front <br /> <br />Mr_ Murphy indicated Council_ will be provided with <br />with offsets and staggering. <br /> <br />this deve men!. He did not think <br />wards those after reviewing this <br />the robotic look of the one <br />ted out the nice appearance of <br />ey 'With townhomes. He stated <br />over these types of structures going <br />to be fought based on the number of <br />etic standpoint, he has not really seen <br /> <br />'"., roposing 30 units where thousands of dollars can <br />itations on the architectural renderings in the <br />t. The e tried to fmd a floor plan that allows single level <br />and bedroom for the elderly. The townhomes on mverslty <br />eferred to are all two, three and four level living) which is <br />r here. There are dozens of vacant tovvnhomes in the City <br />need for oneRfloor living. In addition, the shape of the lot <br /> <br />Councilmem e agrees there is a need for retirement living in the City; however, <br />he believes the m ft to be selling this project. He would also argue on the location <br />behind Super Bowl; I s not think they will selL The bottom line is they are going up against <br />social pressure and concern about these types of structures. The Council represents the City at <br />large, and with the amount of discontent voiced on these issues they have" to represent that. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session I March 20, 2007 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br /> <br />-119- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.