Laserfiche WebLink
resulting from the force of explosion, if it should occur. Because the masonry walls will provide <br />the explosion shield, the earth berm is no longer needed and has been deleted from the plan. The <br />security fence is still part of the project. Fire Chief Kapler has reviewed the revision and <br />determined it to be satisfactory. Ms. Frolik added that staff is recommending, and the applicant <br />is agreeable, to incorporating some landscaping around the perimeter of the accessory building. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to approve the <br />proposed revision to the Vision Ease site plan for an accessory building for the storage of <br />hazardous materials contingent upon some landscaping being incorporated into the plan. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Beyer, Beahen and <br />Haas Steffen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: Request for Revised Site Plan Approval; Case of Amcon Corporation <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that the City has received a revised site plan for approval <br />from Amcon Corporation. The plan, approved in 1997, was for a 49,390 square foot office, <br />manufacturing and warehouse facility on Lot 1, Block 2, Business Park 95 4th Addition. It <br />included a future expansion of approximately 20,000 square feet. The developer has decided to <br />construct the entire structure in one phase, thus the site plan approval needs to be amended for a <br />69,440 square foot facility. The proposal is for three accesses onto McKinley Street - one for <br />truck traffic and two for customers/employees. The site is approximately 5.3 acres in size and <br />the proposed plan is in conformance with City Code. Staff and the Planning Commission are <br />recommending approval. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Haas Steffen and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to approve the <br />revised site plan for Amcon contingent upon compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated <br />February 27, 1998, and modifications to the Landscape Plan. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Haas Steffen, Beyer, Beahen and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #7: <br /> <br />Consider Adopting Resolution Related to Memorandum of Understanding <br />with MnDOT on Burger King Access <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that August 12, 1997, the City of Ramsey granted approval to the <br />Burger King site plan, contingent upon resolving access issues on Highway #10 with MnDOT. <br />He noted that the sketch shows the access onto Highway #10 being on the far west end of the <br />site. MnDOT has not acquired right-of-access onto the Highway #10 of this property, so it must <br />grant a request for access. Mr. Jankowski explained that the City, MnDOT, and the developer all <br />concede that a safer, workable access would be preferably located farther to the west in the <br />vicinity of the pet clinic's current access. To work toward this goal, MnDOT has requested that <br />the City enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Mr. Jankowski interpreted the <br />memorandum as committing the City only to using its best efforts to facilitate obtaining the <br />necessary mutual agreements between the pet clinic and Burger King to consolidate access. The <br />developer will receive a permit to construct an access as approved in the site plan, and MnDOT <br /> <br />City Council/March 10, 1998 <br /> Page 14 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />