My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/17/1998 - Comprehensive Plan Workshop
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1998
>
Minutes - Council - 03/17/1998 - Comprehensive Plan Workshop
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 3:53:55 PM
Creation date
6/12/2003 9:39:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Comprehensive Plan Workshop
Document Date
03/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Haas Steffen noted that Mr. Scheib did not talk about cluster housing. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib responded that's the reason behind Concept B - the two-to-five acres are clusters. <br /> <br />The town center was discussed with regard to location and size. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen noted that the concepts do not meet the targets the Metropolitan <br />Council has set for the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />· Mr. Scheib agreed that Concept A does not, however, Concept B may - he has not mn the <br /> numbers yet. It will tell us what type of densities we will develop at. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated that MnDOT has designated T.H. #47 as a preservation <br />highway but expects us to take on 5,200 more houses. That's more homes and no money for <br />upgrading the highway - and no river crossing. <br /> <br />Mr. Scheib stated that we are committed to see highway improvements - bridge crossing, etc. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that even if Ramsey has zero growth, with what's happening in Oak Grove, <br />Bums and Elk River, our two major roadways will be swamped with traffic. We have to <br />concentrate on upgrading the roads and also on a river crossing. <br /> <br />A comment was made to include a road the City feels will have to be updated and put them into <br />the Comprehensive Plan - taking into consideration the outside growth. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman commented that the densities in Concept A are 1 in 10 and in B it's <br />2 to 5. North of the MUSA it's 4 in 40 but cluster development will be allowed. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to what the City wants to preserve environmentally. There are more <br />units in the B concept, but the density is higher - more open spaces into the corridor rather than <br />in everyone's back yard. <br /> <br />Environmental Specialist Bacon noted that more open space in the plan is public and passive <br />uses. He wondered if Hoisington could look to rural or green businesses and development that <br />support productive uses of open space. We are a community one hour away from the major <br />metro market. He asked if other communities ever look at business development potential for <br />fields, gardens, wetlands, woods for production for specialty crops, for instance. He stated he is <br />not talking about farms - but rather value added uses; Western Europe is an example of economic <br />development programs and initiatives that preserve and restore local jobs, training, unique <br />specialty niches, like nurseries, bed and breakfasts, bicycle tourism, cheese, flowers, herbs, and <br />prairie native seeds. <br /> <br />It was noted that there will be a meeting for public input on April 30, 1998. <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan Update/March 17, 1998 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.