Laserfiche WebLink
alternative, both in terms of impacts on local traffic patterns and long-term operational impacts to ' <br />public works and emergency service providers, particularly the fire department response. Mr. <br />Jankowski added that it is possible to cul-de-sac 149th Avenue at Uranimite or other locations, <br />however, there are good indications that neighboring streets would make similar requests to <br />divert the increased traffic. There are very serious concerns regarding the impact to the fire <br />department response. Emergency vehicle response into cul-de-sacs should be avoided whenever <br />possible due to the fact that the turning radius of large fire apparatus severely limits mobility. <br />This is a non-hydrant area and water must be brought in via truck. Staff is recommending <br />against consideration of this alternative. 2) Alternative A: Mr. Jankowski explained that this <br />would consist of speed humps at roughly 800-foot intervals along the straight section of the <br />corridor and along 149th Lane which would become a likely alternative pathway. The cost of <br />this alternative is estimated at $2,500 per hump, or $20,000. 3) Alternative B: This alternative <br />proposed to control speeding and discourage through traffic by the placement of a stop sign on <br />150th Lane and Willemite Street; at 150th Lane/149th Lane and Uranimite Street; and at 149th <br />Avenue and Peridot. The signs would only stop the east/west traffic which is the cut-through <br />traffic. Mr. Jankowski believed it was unlikely that sufficient traffic exists to warrant four-way <br />or all-way stops at these intersections. The existing stop on the northeast leg of Willemite Street <br />and 150th Lane would be removed. The cost of this alternative is estimated at $200 per sign, or a <br />total of $1,200. 4) Alternative C: Mr. Jankowski explained that this alternative is a combination <br />of Alternatives A and C and is intended to increase the effectiveness of the cut-through deterrent <br />while decreasing cost by using fewer expensive speed humps. This alternative includes four <br />speed humps and six stop signs and the estimated cost is $11,200. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated she has gone to review the area of concern nine times and <br />she is convinced that the only way to slow down the speeders in the 149th area is to put in speed <br />humps, however, she felt they should be at closer intervals. She suggested that the extension of <br />#116 would alleviate the problems on both 149th Avenue and 149th Lane. She indicated she <br />would make a motion that the speed humps be put in. <br /> <br />Patti Hoffman, 7446 - 149th Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that now some of the neighbors have <br />expressed concern about speed humps lowering their property valuation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen suggested it would be difficult to find a solution that 100% of the <br />people are in total agreement with. She suggested maybe the speed humps could be removed <br />once C.R. #116 is completed. She did not agree that speed humps would lower property value. <br /> <br />Ms. Hoffman stated her neighborhood is interested in £mding a remedy, but she asked if Council <br />would put off their decision for a month to see what the neighborhood would come up with. If <br />an agreement cannot be met, they could then wait to see what the extension of #116 does to the <br />traffic concerns. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen noted that Ms. Hoffman stated it is possible to wait to see if #116 <br />takes care of the problems. <br /> <br />Ms. Hoffman inquired if stop signs could be put at Uranimite and 149th and the two-way stop on <br />Willemite be put on 150th instead. She felt that would really be a help. <br /> <br />City Council/March 24, 1998 <br /> Page 6 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />