Laserfiche WebLink
suspension for ten days. Chief Gustafson stated that because these are the first violations <br />of this ordinance, he is very concerned about precedent setting for future violations. He <br />explained that the Anoka County District Court has taken the position that the <br />administrative civil penalty system may not be used with regard to juveniles charged with <br />violating the ordinance and, therefore, juveniles violating this will need to be charged <br />with misdemeanors in District Court. To be consistent, Chief Gustafson felt that all <br />individuals charged should be prosecuted through the Court system and charged with a <br />misdemeanor. With regard to the licensees, Chief Gustafson recommended offering to <br />stipulate a settlement with them, as first time violators, which settlement would require <br />payment of the $500 mandatory fine and no license suspension. <br /> <br />Attorney Goodrich suggested that the court may be willing to amend the misdemeanor to <br />a petty misdemeanor. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Haas Steffen and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to <br />direct the City Attorney and the Police Chief to prosecute in District court, the individual <br />sellers charged with violating Ordinance No. 98-02 and charge each of them with a <br />misdemeanor. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Haas Steffen, Beahen, and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: CouncilmemberBeyer. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Haas Steffen and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to <br />direct the City Attorney and Police Chief to negotiate with the licensees charged with <br />violating Ordinance//98-02 and offer to settle the violation with each of them by paying a <br />$500 administrative civil penalty and require no tobacco license suspension. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Haas Steffen, Beahen, and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: CouncilmemberBeyer. <br /> <br />Case #7: Consider EDA Funding of a Critical Trail Link <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated the purpose of this case is for Council to consider <br />Economic Development Authority (EDA) funding of a 1,307 foot trail connection along <br />County Road #116. Three critical trail links were constructed in 1997, using this same <br />funding source. Those three projects include Ramsey Elementary School to Sunwood <br />Drive along County Road #5, the path along 153rd Avenue from C.R. #5 to the <br />Municipal Center, and also the Cottonwood Park area. Mr. Norman explained that an <br />element of the Regency Pond subdivision park dedication requirement called for trail <br />construction in several areas of the plat, including a segment in the road right-of-way of <br />County Road #116, easterly to Sunwood Drive. These trails are to be paved by the <br />developer. What is being proposed is a trail from Sunwood Drive to the existing trail at <br />Wendell's, Inc. This 1,307 feet of path, at an expected cost of $8.35 per foot is currently <br />unfunded but can be accommodated as part of the developer's administration and <br />coordination of the rest of the trail project. Mr. Norman stated that the developer of <br />Regency Pond was directed to have the trails done prior to May 16, 1998, to provide for <br />the volunteer planting project on that day, within the trail corridor. He summarized the <br /> <br />City Council/May 12, 1998 <br /> Page 11 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />