My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:19:26 PM
Creation date
4/20/2007 9:41:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/24/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt explained this process takes time and the objections of the residents are noted. <br />The residents have the opportunity to speak with their City Council representatives if they have <br />issues. He understands this is troubling; land use in many cases upsets individuals. The issue he <br />has is that this should not have been a surprise; this land use occurred when this property was <br />platted before these homes were purchased. While he understands the residents that are present <br />do not prefer this commercial use, the process they are going through is their way of voicing <br />those opinions. A. <br />Commissioner Cleveland explained the Commission had gxnmended that something <br />better be included to make this more conducive 1 . e I, walk to. She suggested <br />residents may want to contact their councilmen bri "` e experts and ask them <br />their opinion of whether this would depreciat erty , { b t. e stated this <br />proposal meets all the requirements set forth b dmanc emendation <br />will likely be made to move forward on this. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he has been adjacent to a 1 s t agree with. He fought that <br />land use and prevailed. The residents should understand th their consistency if they <br />oppose this with continued vocalization. The sion can in the limits of what <br />they have been given direction to do. <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle explained <br />the particular time and how the land <br />the loading dock located at Jasps-&M <br />Mr. Klain replied there will b. <br />inside the double bays; the <br />are trying to minimize as mi.� <br />with a road that s trash e <br />develonmF There <br />Jas I and 13 rte_ <br />los rnercial space tha" <br />Wd _ comer of the site, <br />inquired <br />nmi at the Statute in the books at <br />I. =' eque t from the applicant regarding <br />venue c appears to be a tight fit. <br />than eno4 _ � `ng radius. All rubbish, etc. will be <br />for trash dis s eas will be up towards the bank. They <br />pact as they can by not having the back of this building <br />d doors, and bringing as much of that inside the <br />me revisions to the loading docks. If there is an n they may be able to move the loading dock at <br />the rit of the building. The only problem would be the <br />alt from a double or triple bay loading dock at the bottom <br />»ect would not be able to sustain itself <br />to the enclosed loading dock in the southeast corner. <br />Mr. Klain r c s?ca Id be in the early hours into the main entrance. The'trucks will <br />pull in and bac r as been worked out with Pioneer Engineering and will be shown to <br />engineering staff.' <br />Commissioner Cleveland inquired about the possibility of flipping the development so the back <br />side is not against the residents. <br />Planning Commission /April 5, 2007 <br />Page 19 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.