Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Klain replied if the development is flipped to the other side the residents would be affected <br />by the quantity of cars, noise, signage, etc. all the time. The way the plan has been presented <br />there is a wall with sloping roofs as a buffer and there will be vegetation put in around it; this <br />cannot be done if everything is flipped. There would be a line of 100 cars up against the edge to <br />meet the same square footage requirements if it were to be flipped. He believes it would be <br />better to have the building buffering everything. It has been zoned for this particular use since <br />they were building the Ryland homes. This is a commercial development that takes deliveries <br />and has people accessing it; it needs to be accessible or there will be a lot of non - leasable spaces. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated the 600 pound gorilla in the <br />places and made promises about what would not T;e n <br />zoned commercial from the day his was latte 1 <br />Y p <br />about that. Anything commercial is legal right t <br />commercial is to change the zoning. He wo <br />developer and figure out something; he sounds li <br />something in there that might at least work out for tb <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated the objection of the residents <br />noted. The suggestion to the residents is their <br />work with the developer. <br />Commissioner Brauer commented t] <br />zoning does not really all fit together. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he <br />urbanized area; other urbaniz <br />effectively. He has a diffe r <br />would rather look at a we <br />parking facile to look <br />during t <br />Nixt <br />��1 €. �r expressed c <br />Ave . ted there <br />be an <br />Chairperson Nit <br />Jaspar Street and <br />sed for this site is <br />resentatives and to <br />a classic example of where <br />agree wi _ ent. This was intended to be an <br />have rta anresidential working in tandem <br />n regarding that if he lived across the street he <br />1 area adjacent to a building providing a separation from a <br />lying up and shining their headlights 12 hours per day <br />from t�iommission regarding any concerns about the site <br />arding the loading dock located at Jaspar Street and 138 <br />using around there all the time unsupervised, and there will <br />because a truck does not see them. <br />has an objection with the layout of the loading dock located on <br />as it is included in the site plan. <br />There was discussion regarding the loading dock located on Jaspar Street and 138 Avenue. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated the developer has done a masterful job to provide use of the building <br />structure as a theoretical buffer. The areas where the concept falls short are the location of this <br />Planning Commission /April 5, 2007 <br />Page 20 of 25 <br />