Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner lensen agreed with Commissioner Deemer that the buffer zone of 30 feet between <br />driveway and south property line is minimal and should be increased. She asked if there would be <br />a way to increase the buffer area or flip-flop the building layout. <br /> <br />Denise Albrecht, 5313 - 143rd Avenue, asked why the driveway would be positioned on <br />Dysprosium Street and not on County Road 5, where there is no residential traffic. She stated <br />concern about traffic level increases and stated the speed humps on Dysprosium did not slow <br />traffic. She indicated a.m. and p.m. times are worse. City Engineer Jankowski stated it is safer to <br />have fewer accesses on a collector street. He indicated a speed study is completed one year after <br />the speed humps are installed and speed levels reduced by 4 miles per hour. He indicated he <br />would share the study with Ms. Albrecht at her request. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Jensen, to recommend City <br />Council approve the site plan provided the building layout be reversed so that the entrance door <br />to underground parking is on the northwest end and that the applicant apply to the County for a <br />right turn access onto County Road 5 from the building to allow people to drive out the door and <br />onto County Road 5; and that all accesses from the complex would be ~ with the City's <br />chosen priority street light fixture, i llmvu'~d <br /> <br />Further Discussion: City Engineer Jankowski and Commissioner LaDue disagreed with putting <br />traffic directly onto County Road 5. <br /> <br />Amendment by Commissioner Jensen, seconded by Commissioner LaDue, to amend the motion <br />removing the portion regarding access onto County Road 5. <br /> <br />Amendment Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Jensen, LaDue, <br />Anderson, Deemer, Terry, and Wivoda. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Further Discussion Continued: Commissioner Anderson stated being reluctant to vote for the <br />motion without giving the architects time to determine if the recommended plan modifications are <br />workable and indicated he would oppose the motion. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Commissioners Deemer, Jensen, LaDue, and Wivoda. Voting No: <br />Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Anderson and Terry. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for a Site Plan Review; Case of Building Fasteners and Sharp and <br />Associates <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated the plan proposes to construct an office/warehouse facility on <br />Lot 2 of the A.E.C. Energy Park 3rd Addition. The office warehouse use is consistent with the <br />permitted use in the Business Warehouse zoning district. The site plan proposes an initial building <br />size of 31,404 square feet with a future addition of 19,352 square feet. The ultimate facility size <br />complies with the 35% lot coverage restriction. In accordance with City Code, the exterior walls <br />of the building are proposed to consist of concrete masonry units. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 4, 1998 <br /> Page 10 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />