My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:41:38 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 8:11:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/03/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />meetings with the town they had wanted a commercial center, and this is basically what they <br />have now gone through 3 ~ to 4 months of drawing up plans and working on. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindberg stated the commercial center was not supposed to be here. He asked what the <br />community can do to stop this, or at least control some of this development, in particular this <br />pIece. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt replied the residents are doing that by voicing their opi11ion. They can also talk <br />to their councilmember at large and the councilmember representing their ward and ask them to <br />consider appropriate land uses that are within the land use designation. He indicated from his <br />point of view this is zoned properly. He asked if commissioners have reasons why the <br />Commission as a planning body should not recommend approval of this development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt commented he thought this would be a nice addition to that type of an area <br />that would be walkable for the residents. With the number of residents on that side of the <br />highway that it could very well fit with a neighborhood type of a setting, rather than having to get <br />into their cars and drive somewhere like Target. <br /> <br />Commissioner Levine stated the Commission looked at this before and the developer did a nice <br />job laying it out; he thinks it will be an attractive area to shop in. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland indicated at the last meeting the Commission was pleased with the <br />outcome that tins would meet the needs of the neighbors with shopping, entertai11ment, and drug <br />stores, and the residents being able to reach it all by walking. The area the residents are <br />concel11ed with that COllilects the buildings was actually a recommendation from the Commission <br />to keep the children and adults from having to cross a street to get to the shopping area. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt explained tlns process takes time and the objections of the residents are noted. <br />The residents have the opportunity to speak with their City Council representatives if they have <br />issues. He understands this is troubling; land use in many cases upsets individuals. The issue he <br />has is that this should not have been a surprise; this land use occurred when tIns property was <br />platted before these homes were purchased. While he understands the residents that are present <br />do not prefer this commercial use, the process they are going through is their way of voicing <br />those opi11ions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland explained the Comnnssion had actually recommended that somethi1lg <br />better be included to make this more conducive for the residents to walk to. She suggested <br />residents may want to contact their councilmembers and bring in real estate experts and ask them <br />their opinion of whether this would depreciate property value or increase it. She stated this <br />proposal meets all the requirements set forth by the zoning ordinance and the recommendation <br />will likely be made to move forward on this. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he has been adjacent to a land use he did not agree with. He fought that <br />land use and prevailed. The residents should understand the power of their consistency if they <br />oppose tlns with continued vocalization. The Commission can only do witlnn the limits of what <br />they have been given direction to do. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 5, 2007 <br />Page 16 of 22 <br /> <br />P16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.