My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:38:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 8:32:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/14/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />there, that all the units not be dependant on only one-access point. The Fire Chief wOUld allow up <br />to three townhouse structures to be constructed with having only one exit. out. He stated one of <br />the' issues is that there is some concern with the alignment of the intersection with Highway 10 be <br />at a perpendicular angle rather than what exists there now, He stated this was not the major <br />concern with MN/Dot. He stated MN/Dot's letter mentions a closure, or all.. access points <br />between. Ramsey and Sunfish and they talked about this with them and MN/Dot is not going to <br />push. closing these roads. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated MN/Dot made the comment that any intersection south of <br />Highway 10 should occu? no closer 'than 500 hundred to 660 feet south of the highway, which is <br />difficult for the developer because they only own 350 feet South. He stated they talked with <br />MN/Dot about this and the rationale behind this is primarilY not the alignment of the kink that <br />bothers them, it is ultimately having intersections in clOse proximity of each other and motorists <br />traveling through this would need to make decisions for both interSections at the same time. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski showed a map of the proposed, road and discUssed the two Options. <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if all of this involved Anoka County. ' <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated the most desirable woUld involve Anoka County and they need to <br />have a meeting with. Anoka County to find Out What their deskes are. <br /> <br />City Engineer J'ankowski stated, they have talked about .it this aRernoon and they have a proposal <br />they could mn by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated this particular configuration is' troublesome to him. He asked which road <br />would preempt there, Riverdale or Rarnsey Boulevard. He stated this seems to be a problematic <br />design~ <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated when they start to think about how traffic is going to get into the <br />commercial development but they have to keep in mind that Riverdale is part of a frontage system <br />and the City has a plan for a frontage system.to take traffic off of HighwaY 10. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Watd stated one of the ideas they had was to include an outlot 'for the portion <br />of Riverdale Drive that started at the last townhouse unit and continued north for the Preliminary <br />plat. The Developer would then go to the City Council with a final plat for Lots 8,. 9, and 10.: At <br />such time the Developer, Anoka County, and the City works out an alignment for Riverdale <br />Drive, the Applicant would final, plat the remaining, portion of the townhouse project. She <br />.showed a map of the area and discussed the proposal with the Commissionl · <br /> <br />Mr. Dave Schulte stated they have. had numerous discussionS' with Ramsey staff and Anoka <br />County and it isa difficult situation because MN/Dot is in the process of updating the-interseCtion <br />in 2004. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October lO, 2002 <br /> Page 9 of 20 <br /> <br />-1.23- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.