Laserfiche WebLink
-t24- <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />There was none. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to close th_e'public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, CommiSsioners Kociscak, Brauer, and Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson and Watson. ' <br /> <br />The Public heating closed at 8:57 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of .the Planning Commission back to order at 8:57 <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nix-t, seconded by Commissioner Brauer, to recommend that the City <br />Council approve the preliminary plat of R/venwick 3~d Addition-contingent upon compliance with <br />City Staff review letter dated September 27, 2002 and further subject to modifying the proposed <br />plat to include Outlot A as depicted this evening and the City Council taking a final plating consist <br />of lots 8, 9; and 10 and acceptinglthe proposed landscape buffering along the southern boundary- <br />line as fulfilling density transitiOning requirements for this plat and the developer receic, nga <br />rezoning of that portion of the subject property which is zoned B-1 Business. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Reeve asked regarding the trees, if staff could' go out and <br />make sure the plantings are not undesirables. Associate Planner Wold. stated they already know <br />the species and they are desirable trees. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: ChairperSon Nixt, Commissioners Brauer, KociScak, and Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners JOhnson and Watson. <br /> <br />Case #9: Request for Site Plan Review of Rivenwick 3~ Addition; Case of Turtle <br /> ~loon, Inc. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated the City received an application from Turtle Moon Inc. for site <br />plan review of a townhome development. The property is. generally located south of' Riverdale <br />Drive and north of the existing~Rivenwick urban residential development. The project area. is <br />approximately 1.9.46. acres in size.. The maximum net density established', in the R,2 District is 7 <br />units per acre: Net density for the proposed· development is 7 units, per acre; this complies with <br />City Code. R;iverdaie Drive is proposing to. connect to Highway #1.0 and to Garnet Street. <br />Connecting'Riverdale Drive to Highway. #I0 will involve the resignalization of Highway. #10 and <br />Ramsey Blvd.. intersection: The proposed development meets all setbacks, Unit size, structure:. <br />height, and off-street Parking requirements established in the 1t,-2 distriCtl The site plan. meets the <br />landscaping and screening requirements. The Planning Commission tabled action on the site plan <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October t0, 2002 <br /> Page 10'of 20. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br />.I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />