Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Case #1: Adopt Ordinance to Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement in Northfork <br /> Oaks Third Addition: Case of Aathony Moulder <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that Mr..Moulder, who resides at 16271. Royal- <br />Road (Lot 4, Block 3, Northfork Oaks Third Addition), applied for an. administrative subdivision <br />to acquire a portion of his neighbor's property to the south (Lot 3, Block 3, Northfork Oaks Third <br />Addition). This acquisition enables Mr. Moulder to comply with the side. yard setback <br />requirement for accessory structures. To accommodate this acquisition, the existing drainage and <br />utility easements along the common property line must be vacated. City S-taf~ is taking steps to <br />obtain drainage and utility easements along the new common property line. On October 22, <br />2002, City Council introduced an ordinance to vacate drainage-and utility easements contained' <br />within portions of Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Northfork' Oaks Third-Addition. These areas ofLots 3 <br />and 4 have been acquired by Mr. Moulder to. ensure he is in .com~ pliance with side yard setback <br />requirements for accessory structures. In accordance with the City Charter,. the ordinance was <br />eligible for adoption. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, tO adopt Ordinance <br />#02-30 to vacate the drainage and utility easements on Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Northfork Oaks <br />Third Addition. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary: <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen aye <br />Councilmember Anderson aye <br />Councilmember Kurak aye <br />Councitmember Zimmerman absent <br />Mayor Gamec aye <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Request to Vacate Public Street and Utility Easement: Case of Links at <br />Northfork GC, LLC <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that in researching the easement it was <br />determined that the easement had been vacated in 1991 so no action was required. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary 'Plat Review of Rivenwick 3rd Addition: Case of <br />Turtle Moon, Inc.. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated that Turtle Moon Inc. has applied for preliminary plat review of a <br />townhome development. The property is generally located south of R/verdale Drive and north of <br />the existing R/venwick urban residential development. The project area is approximately 19.46. <br />acres in size. The maximum net density established in the R-2 District is 7 units per acre. The <br />preliminary plat is proposing to development. 112 townhouse umts. The development contains an <br /> <br />City Council/November 12, 2002 <br /> Page 10 of 22 <br /> <br />-125- <br /> <br /> <br />