Laserfiche WebLink
Member LeToumeau stated that as a business owner on the comer he could represent <br /> feelings of both businesses and the EDA in their desire to help the-area survive and <br /> better. He feels the information from this survey will be great information not onl; <br /> businesses but to determine what could come in and work. The survey will to <br /> move forward. ... <br /> <br /> City Administrator Norman stated he thinks the surWey'.will provide the- <br /> . . <br /> allow and encourage commermal nodes, to exast. . ~,~ <br /> <br /> .... · . . . ~,~!;~¢;? .... ~ . - <br /> Member Kiefer reiterated that this w~ll prowde statistical data.,~ack uP~(~e assumptmn that the <br /> comer is worth renovating, or provide facts that indicate ta uld begin to try and relocate" <br /> the businesses there. With this information if a developeE.g~mes in and wants to invest or do a <br /> redevelopment project, the EDA and the City will be ~3.1o make g°~decisions. <br /> <br /> Member Kurak added she would ~magune the mformat~on coUt~be,:~e~t to'promote the comer. <br /> She added that while she understands the value of the informatimi, she doesn't want to repeat, <br /> .. -¢.%. <br /> and pay again, for what has already been done. ' ~ <br /> <br /> Member LeToumeau recommended mo~g forward' but having staffr ~ might be <br /> duphcat~on of the previous study.;,:)~i,?mmt~,¢e Committee to keep ~:mmd that the <br /> McComb Group has already do~;§0n~'¢;of the ~K(¢,.~' a new company}~i)uld be starting from <br /> ii~~mtCb~Ki~ce[fi'i;}i:;t~fd 7 ~~ dit s sm~ouGl~°~lt;~°rk <br /> Motion by M~ber Kiefer;;)~conded by Merri~r Gr~berg, to' recommend to C~ty Counml that <br /> they move~ah'~hd with the m~ket analysis co~g~:~)n staff meeting with the ._M.,c_Comb Group <br /> to negotiEie"a more cost effect proposal by t into account the work they ve previously <br /> ,: ...._ · -5 :: ¢~ ' ~: <br /> <br /> Motion carried. *'.~o~g Yes: Chart-person Riley, Members Kiefer; Gromberg, Kurak,. Steffen, <br />~,.,and Strommen. V~g No: None. Member LeToumeau abstained. <br /> <br /> Case #3. ~. Grosslem:Be,ve~age Property/Bulow Inc. Property_ · <br /> <br /> ~i !'~-~ '-. ('} -:;~ .': '*-)¢;;'~ ' ~ <br /> <br /> Associate Planner Wald~stated Grossle~n Beverage owns the vacant parcel located next to <br /> Comfort Suites~"[~ 'The parcel is zoned commercial and Duke Gro'sslein, owner of Grosslein <br /> Beverage, is. int~ested in developing thesite with a restaurant. <br /> <br /> :'T~he subject pr0~erty is. approximately 1.9 acres in size and contains a large drainage pond- that <br /> w~as,.designed~to handle the drainage from Comfort Suites and any development on the subject <br /> vacahtprOperty. Due to the large drainage pond, the site does not provide for adequate space for <br /> parking/tnd a restaurant, facility. <br /> <br /> Economic Development Authority / January 13, 2003 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br />-117- <br /> <br /> <br />