My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/21/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/21/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:40:09 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 11:43:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/21/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt asked if the City had the ability to enforce their ordinanceS even <br />approves of smaller lot sizes. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon believes the City has that fight. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked that City Staff confirm this option. He alSo <br />having 15,000 square foot lots in the necessary areas of the development <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked for clarification on the results of the <br /> <br />Chet Harrison, representing .the developer, indicated-the <br />shoreline· He stated that the natural grade of the land <br />except in extreme storms. He indicated the ponds <br />the DNR was happy about that. He added that the <br />the sketch plan provides. <br /> <br /> mostly concerned about the. <br />time nOt create any <br /> same thing, and' <br /> wh/ch <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon added <br />development is far from the Ordinary <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked <br /> <br />that <br /> <br />the DNR has taker that the <br /> point. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon <br />meet those requirements. <br /> <br />)erc~t~ <br /> <br />indicated they could <br /> <br />Commissioner that <br />approval, and compelling <br />cost of land. <br /> <br /> geon seems to be in favor of <br />to approve the use of smaller lots besides the <br /> <br /> Trud ated he .was of this development· He aSked that the <br />C to develop. 'He stated thai by'consistently <br />following i often end up with the same developments' over and <br />over agmn, many~gs very umnspzred While st zs uncomfortable to stray from <br />ffi6s! :'i¢ rdm. races, zt z~et~mes necessary to add creativity. This development has .been coined <br />as m w ~mizatlon wYri~..~n~ges soc~alzzmg vathin the development by brmgnng structures <br />toward the$~ewa!k and s~ather than the backyard. · <br /> <br /> ifiaicated that all of the things mentioned could be accomplished with <br /> he needs more of a reason to approve the h/gher density. . <br /> <br /> stated the Commission reviewed the ordinances and determined the .density <br /> single .family homes. Now the Commission is being asked to forget those <br /> the name of good develoPment. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/JanUary <br /> Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />2, 2003 <br /> <br />- -11' <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.