My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/21/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/21/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:40:09 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 11:43:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/21/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Principal Planner Trudgeon asked if the Commission would be in favor of the .plan if the <br />were 3.9 structures per acre rather than 4.4 as proposed. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated he would love it if that were the case. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that if the .City .wants .this <br />~consider making some concessions. <br /> <br />tO <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson reiterated that.he needs a <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas stated that New Urbanism means different <br />means narrower lots, smaller side lots and two car <br />park a boat or a trailer on the side, it also makes it <br />to make that choice, and many will. <br /> <br />everyone. As developers it <br /> there is no space to <br /> .eowner would need <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated the Commission cannot thn <br />who says land is expensive. <br /> <br />.ordinances for everyone <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas asked if the <br />would be acceptable. <br /> <br />~eet the four units per <br /> <br />if the plan <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer the <br />that the Commission couldn't grant vari~ for <br /> <br />rea~ <br /> <br />road width. He added <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas sighbors ed to the <br />comments. <br /> <br />and asked for the Commissions <br /> <br />some <br /> <br />asked for i of the <br />feet, parts of the <br /> <br />widths. The summary provided says <br />45 to 55 feet. <br /> <br /> City was scaled from thesketch drawing. He knows <br /> now that their to have mimmums of 50 feet. <br /> <br />/~Mr.'l~_3ndicated requestmg less than the normal 32 feet of paved area, and as <br /> little as ~i(~t paved on he private roads. This allows for parking on one side of the <br /> street. He a~b.wledged~ Skis slows down traffic, but stated that was the ~ntent. ' <br /> <br /> Chairperson ~ asked if the develoPers believed 'that no sidewalk and smaller streets would <br /> facilitate soci~destrian traffic. He questioned Where kids would be able to ride their bikes. <br /> Kan that they believe with the open spaces provided socialization-would be <br /> <br />-12- <br /> <br />Nixt asked if sixteen feet would provide safe passage for emergency vehicles. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.