Laserfiche WebLink
· <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairperson Nixt to recommend that City <br />Council adopt Findings of Fact favorable to the applicant relating to Janis Day's request,?~i~:¢ <br />home occupation permit. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johns~n~ ar, Reeve, <br />Shepherd, Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. ~!?;* ~:~:'d%' <br /> <br />MOtion bY Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brauer t3~J~b~.,ommend'ih~}'i¢~e <br />City Council approve Janis Day's request for a home oCCupation pemfit base~76h~,the <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chaicerson Nixt, Comm'~t~'~i°ners Jonson, Brauer, R.eeve, <br />Shepherd, Van Scoy ~d Watson. Voting No: None. Ab~t: None. - <br /> <br />Case #3 Request for an Interim Use Permi~i~5'~ff6w of Commercial <br /> Vehicles and Equipment on a .; Case of Gerald <br /> Bauer <br /> <br /> ·Presentation <br /> Associate Planner Wald explain~:~;~'~'~:C~t7' received a .x of 2002, <br /> reporting that Able Paving ~1~ c6n.structi~gs:::~storing their commercial vehicles and <br /> equipment and possibly oper~t~ihg a tSt~,,nch office'; prope ~r~ ~,~, located at 16130 Vari.olite <br /> Street, also known as the St. Anthony G~kClub ~~. 'X'S§~!~l)~;'Planner Wald indicated'that <br /> Gerry Bauer is the owner of the subject ~pe~'~hich is no lled Ramsey Shooting Center. <br /> Staff contacted Mr. Bauer on November i~}~2 stating th'~':i'~':~he R. amsey Shooting Center is a <br /> legal non-confo~~/x~:h9wever addition~icommercial activity on the subject property would <br /> be a violation-:~ft~ity Cod~}}~ She indicated ~t Mr. Bauer contacted City Staff and stated he is <br /> leasing a po~i~n of the su~j;'~ct property to A~.~ng and Construction, who is' utilizing the <br /> property~0~' outside stora~i~of thei~ commer ehicles and equipment. She indicated 'Mr. <br /> Baue,~f~;~:e. sting an int~::~¢_p~i~t to ~ for outside storage of commercial vehicles and <br /> equipment o~e_ subj,~'~iO~5~6:~imately a 2-year period. Associate' Planner Wald <br /> advised it is St~'~z~1i;iion that the request to store commercial' 'vehicles and equipment on the <br /> scbj~ct property ~¢t the most desirable ~se for the sub~ject property. She indicated Staff is <br /> ~ed with the 6'~a.m. st~ing time and the commercial nature of the business increasing <br /> in activ~!}4,u, dng the ~fi-~~onths when construction is at its busiest time. Staff is also <br /> concerned ~h mecharfic~i:k being performed on site and excess construction and paving <br /> products bein~ibrought to~:~' property. <br /> <br /> Associate Plann~ Wald indicated that Staff is. recommending denial of the request at this time. <br /> She explained' ~t Staff is of the opinion that the surrounding residential neighborhood could be <br />'"!~ig~gatively aff'e.7~{~ed by the increase in traffic and commercial vehicle noise that Will be generated <br /> 'l~yi::~)e natu~62bf Able Paving's business, especially during the busy construct/on season. She <br /> state'd::St~ff is also concerned that if the City granted the interim use permit allowing only <br /> outdo.0~storage of vehicles and equipment and did not permit mechanical work on site or product <br /> to b~"brought to the site, the opportunity to perform a quick mechanical, fix or store excess <br /> <br />-106- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 6, 2003 <br /> Page 3 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />