Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I ! I I I I '1 Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, B~f~:.'.Reeve, Shepherd, Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. .~'~ Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded 'by Commissioner arauer t0::!f,g~'mmend that. the City Council approw Janis Day's request for a home occupation pe~it,~:~d o~"~¢~ findings of Motion Camed. VoQng Yes. Chal~erson Nlxt, Co~xssmners Jo~son, Brauer,. 'o · -~< '~:;::: '~-". '%' Shepherd, Van Scoy and Watson.. Vot~n~ No. None. Absent,~,-.~None~.~:~.. '~,~, Case ~3 Request Dr an Interim Use Permit to Allow Outdoor Stora=e of Commereia[:}~' Vehicles and Equipment on a Resid~htially Zoned Pared; Case of -,:¢~.:.:::>_ ,~3);~ . Associate Pla~er Weld explained that the Ci~ received i~'~omplaint in November of 2002, reposing that Able Paving and Construction was stofing'~i~e~ co~emial vehicles and equipment and possibly operating a branch o~ce on the prope~,!ocat¢:~?at 16130 Vafiolite Street, also ~own as the St. Au~::.Gun Club prope=y. Associat~ ~r Weld indicated that Ge~ Bauer is the owner of t~61~bjeci'~?Omy, which is now calk~:~amsey Shooting. Center. Staff contacted Mr. Bauer 8~Nov~ber 14, J00~)St~ing that ~e ~imsey Shooting Center is a legal non-confo~ing use, howev~ :idditional c~cia~5.~tN}~ on the subject prope~y would be a violation of City Code. She in~i~aated ~ii::'~. Baue~:~6~{acted Ci~ Staff and stated he is leasing a po~ion of the subject prope~ to?.A~le Paving ~d Construction, who is utilizing the prope~y for o~id~.?orag¢ of their es~ercial vehicl~ and equipment. She indicated Mr. Bauer is re~u~sting'an'Ntefim use pe~ie ~o allow for outside storage of co~ercial vehicles and equipme~'On the subject prope=y for ap~0xima~ely a 2-ye~ period. Associate Pla~er Weld advised: it" is SteWs opi~on ~at the request:5~0¢itore commercial vehicles and equipment'on subje6t'prope~ is not,the most desirable ~use for the subject prope~. She indicated Staff is' concerned with the 6:0Oa~m::,:sta~ng time'nd the co~ercial nature of the business increasing in activit]'~dufing ~-~'~er:':~sht~.SWhen construction is-at its busiest time. Staff is also concerned wi:~ mechanical work being performed on site and excess construction and paving I - ,..: . ..:, products being 'Brbu~ht to the property, 8~.4~?;"' As~*~gi:ate Planner ~ti5 in¢i~iited that Staff is recommending denial of the request at this time. l?' She exI~l;~ined that Sta~:.i~'~ the opinion, that the surrounding residential neighborhood could be ~ · · ,~ ,. ;:' ~ .... negat~vely".iffected by.the increase m traffic and commercial vehicle noise that will' be generated !", by the natdi~ of Able'~Paving's business, especially during the.busy construction season. She 1 5¢ii;i~i!i:!~ii:..:,. stated Staf~;~,i% also concerned that if the City granted the interim use permit allowing only :::. outdoor stogage of vehicles and equipment and did not permit mechanical work on site or product ':"' to be brought to the site, the opportunity to perform, a-quick mechanical fix or store excess ':(.: product..overnight is greatly increased. She added that an emai] had been received from a ':"~heighbor'opposing the request, which was distributed to the Commission. Citizen Input Chairperson Nixt opened the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m. Planning Commission/February 6, 2003 Page 3 of 26 -125-