My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:45:42 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 12:04:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/25/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-134- <br /> <br />In addition to taking advantage of the option to develop at a density of up to 4 units per acre, the <br />applicant is proposing that the subdivision be processed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). <br />The applicant is requesting the use of a PUD due to the unique nature of their development. The <br />applicant is proposing to develop a "new urbanist" subdivision that is characterized by smaller <br />lots, narrow streets, and a pedestrian-orientated design. <br /> <br />The following is a listing of deviations from City Code that the applicant is requesting to be <br />considered as part of the PUD request. <br /> <br />Smaller lot sizes for urban single-family lots. Current regulations require that urban single- <br />family homes be located on lots of at least 10,800 square feet in size. The proposed <br />development shows single family homes being located on lots ranging from 5,460 to 8,500 <br />square feet. <br />Narrower lot widths for urban single-family lots. Current regulations reqdire that urban <br />single-family homes be located on lots that are at least 80 feet wide at the front-yard setback <br />line. The proposed development shows lot widths for the urban single-family lots as narrow <br />as50 feet. <br />Reduced building setbacks. The development is proposing smaller setbacks as shown in the <br />following table: <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.