Laserfiche WebLink
Cornrnission with a request to make it medium density. The Commission at that time, and the <br /> City Council, voted to leave the property as is rather, than. change the density allowance: When <br /> the current developers first talked about obtaining the property it was discussed as a PUD. A <br /> PUD is four units per acre. They would need to remove 14 units to be within the PUD <br /> requirements. He asked' the developer if that would make or break the deal. <br /> <br /> Todd Bierstad, owner of Todd Allen Homes, responded that he wasn't sure how losing 15 homes' <br /> would affect the bottom line. If the decision by. the City says they have to reduce the number of <br /> lots they would re-dO the math and see if it still makes, sense: He added he was willing to look at <br /> it if necessa~'y. . <br /> <br /> Mr. Raygor Stated the general consensus of the neighbors was that they like the architecture,' <br /> layouts, and home styles. He stated some of the residents want to eliminate the walk2ng path, <br /> some didn't Want it to connect with Tungsten, but generally they like what they see. He.added he <br /> was glad they were using individual units rather than twin homes or quad homes, bUt he is still- <br /> concerned about the density. He' stated if the developers can develop within a pUD, everyone <br /> will be happy. <br /> <br />Steve Thurlen, 14700 Potassium, agreed that density is an issue for the neighbors. He stated the <br />trail behind the houses is not appealing. He added he already spends considerable time cleaning <br />up the sidewalk in front of his house and assumes a trail in back would require the-same. He <br />stated density transition is also a concern. The lots would be 40 feet from the back yards of the <br />adjoining Properties. He stated there would be small l°ts backing up to 10,800 square foot lots. <br />He appreciates that they want to save the trees, but believes· there is a lot of work needed along <br />· the edges of the plan. He added there was no mention at the meeting about trying to change the <br />- Comprehensive Plan, which creates hard feelings. <br /> <br /> I <br />.I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-160- <br /> <br />Sandy Bertzyk, 6001 <br />maintained cottages. <br />more trees. <br /> <br />146~' Avenue N-kV, asked if there was a need to have two entrances to the <br />She Stated that if the private drives didn't have two entrances it would save <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt explained' 'that there was .discussion about malting that phvate drive a public. <br />street. <br /> <br />_ Ms. B'ertzyk asked if the cul-de-sac at the other end was okay: <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated a public street could end in a cul-de-sac if all the requirements were <br />met. He suggested Ms. Burtsick meet with the developer if she has suggestions. <br /> <br />Eric Zache indicated he was not a neighbor, but had attended the ·neighborhood meeting~ He <br />stated ·seven units per acre would be 196 units. If the Commission changes the Comprehensive <br />Plan they would open themselves to that possibility. He questioned the inability of the developer <br />to answer Mr. Raygor's question. He added that getting emergency people between the homes <br />would be difficult with only a ten-foot separation. He stated the market plans show the homes <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br />.I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />