Laserfiche WebLink
Principal Planner Trudgeon reviewed the proposed setbacks of the deVelopment and the options <br />the Council has as it relates to .density transition. He explained that if they were to require a <br />landscaping buffer there would have to be a 25-foot buffer between the new units and the <br />existing homes because it would'be.mediUm density adjacent to low density. There is adequate <br />space in the development to provide the buffer. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if there would bean opportunity to move the cOttages back five feet with <br />the elimination of the trail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that if they are passing the safety test for fireandsafety they. should <br />maintain as much of a buffer :as possible. He noted that he would like the developer to meet-with <br />the Environmental Policy Task Force to discuss the buffer and the Planting Of additional trees. <br /> <br />Paul Kangas, Loucks and Associates, explained that they are trying to develop Something new in <br />the community by using smaller lots and making them Very marketable. What concerned him is <br />that some of the things they hoped to provide has been talked about being eliminated fi.om the <br />plan. He stated that the initial sketch plan was a better layout appearance wise, but does not <br />work with larger public right-of-way. They have dropped the unit count fi.om 129 to 115 to <br />reduce the density. They are trying to be good neighbors by addressing the concerns of the' <br />existing, neighbors. Surprisingly they are finding that trails are being seen as negative,' when <br />normally they are viewed as a positive. Residents were concerned about the narrower 10ts so <br />they widened them. Mn'. Kangas explained, that he has been given a mandate from the owners <br />group to get at least 115 units on. the property. Some of the issues with wider streets and. Wider <br />rights-of-ways pushes the units to the perimeter and some of the things that make it a quality <br />development is the narrower streets and boulevards. Nobody disPutes the fact that the <br />development has to be safe but there are many exampleS of communities, that have narrower <br />streets. The development was modeled after Liberty on the Lakes in Stillwater that 'has the <br />narrow streets. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that it seemed as if everyone was comfortable with the 115 units .being <br />proposed. - .' <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon noted that the wider roads do not impact the number of units. The <br />only thing that might impact the number.of units is the connection to Tungsten Street. . ' <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas stated that with the wider street width requirement, there is land that is lost. He .. <br />stated that they are asking, the Council to take a creative look at the layout of the development by <br />using the planned unit development process. The homeowner'S association agreements .can be <br />written so that the private streets are maintained by the' homeowners aSsociation. They are not <br />proposing anything that would be a detriment to the community. ' <br /> <br />Mayor Gamee inquired' if they were to compromise on a 3'0 foot .wide road would staff be <br />comfortable with that. <br /> <br />Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br />City Council/January 21, 2003. <br /> <br />-167- <br /> <br /> <br />