My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:45:42 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 12:04:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/25/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer JankowSk/stated that there are three ponds, with the majority of the site <br />to the two ponds on the northwest part of the site-into two ponds. The th/rd pond <br />edge of the plot, proposed to drain into the lowest part. He stated there was <br />third spot because the area around it is wooded, and may not have adequate <br />If it filled to overflow, there may be a' negative impact to the mature · He <br />indicated he has been talking to the developer about Other options for the <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the drainage would' go through the asked <br />impact that would have on the proposed lots. · <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated it would have little He the developer's. <br />engineer had pointed out several issues, and the survey .al view/~ormation was different, <br />so they were still discussing. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the drainage plan was changed, <br />significantly? <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated <br /> <br />not significantly mupact <br /> <br />of the lots <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated in the <br />is the dry pond. <br /> <br />connectin <br /> <br />s. He asked which <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated the <br />Lake. <br /> <br />md would drain tO Sunfish <br /> <br />Commissioner <br />widths. <br /> <br />cated when <br /> <br />roads are discussed there is an assumption on <br /> <br />Trudge( ted the city <br /> <br />uirements for private roads as well as public <br /> <br />Commi: asked if 32-foo <br /> <br />pertaine~l to public roads. <br /> <br /> area, <br />to 24-~ <br /> <br /> that when the City Council first discussed private roads <br />widths, were talked: The developer indicated they desired not. <br /> <br />Scoy clarified that the City Council requested' 32-foot private roads. <br /> <br />Trudgeon indicated' affirmatixtely. <br /> <br /> Todd Allen' Homes, thanked Principal Planner Tmdgeon for.the presentation. He <br /> obvious from the number of plans presented to the Commission that they-have tried' to <br />everyone. He mentioned that Traditional Neighborhood Development is different than <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 6, 2003 <br /> Page 11 of 26 <br /> <br />-175- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.