Laserfiche WebLink
others in Ramsey, and is matting everyone think a little differently. He stated that whi, <br />any <br />have been done elsewhere, he would like to see this in Ramsey, and he thinks it.~J~:~.~ <br />beautiful development. He stated they thed to mix what works best for the and xi~x~ <br /> <br /> comfort of the neighborhood. He stated that most streets are 26 feet wide, with <br /> 24 feet. He indicated they added more open area in the center of the cotta <br />. the Commission that the homes live to the front, where the owners can <br /> <br /> Paul Kangas, LouCks and Associates stated they had'adjusted the. <br /> different needs, but the plan requests differ with each group.. He <br /> be the biggest issues. He indicated' the roads have a <br /> not seem to be the issue, but the road width curb to curb is <br />· sketches to illustrate why they th/nk 26 feet wide is safe <br /> the widest fire truck is eight and a half feet wide, <br /> would have room to pass. He indicated they <br /> narrower roads can be safe.. He stated they were not <br /> cheaper, but because they keep in sync with the feel of the <br /> stated the streets are long and straight, and the developers feel <br /> days per year without snow is more important than building <br />.purposes. He stated that there spaces for each unit, <br />need. He stated they were space, which <br />using narrower roads. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if there <br />private road. <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas in~:-~f;~puld be no <br />foot private m~?~Was not 6~)~terest to the <br />not have t0~'mamtam....~, ~t ~f it ~s to be ~at <br /> to me~t::~ req <br /> <br />stated they h~ <br />may have <br /> a challen <br /> He <br /> <br />being <br /> ted <br /> <br />screen how cars <br />the <br />they are <br />neighborhood. He <br />on the 310 <br />~w storage <br />exceed any <br />of the reasons for <br /> <br />)ot stretch of 24-fo°t Wide' ' <br /> <br />anywhere in the association area. He stated a 32 <br />as they would make'it a public road. and <br />there was some miscommunication, <br />preservation. He indicated they did not get <br />to use to help meet the requirements.. He <br />that the trees were very dense through there, and <br />Mr. angas stated the sloping was steep in some places and <br />indicated if the Tungsten connection is not required, they could save <br />been quite clear they do not want the trail. <br /> <br /> he could appreciate why the neighbors do not want the trail, <br />move it closer to the other lots. <br /> <br />-176- <br /> <br />but' <br /> <br />was not convinced'there Was a need for it: <br /> <br /> ,onded that for the same reason the existing neighbors do not want it, they would <br /> ~ted in putting it closer to the new homes. He stated it provides a nice connection, <br />not be a good idea when the lots are shallower than existing homes. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 6, 2003 <br /> Page 12 of 26 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />