Laserfiche WebLink
their privacy. He stated the path on the southwest corner wouldbe right out their windo, <br />as the letter states, they are concerned about dogs barking as they pass by when they <br />enjoy their backyard. He indicated that the two ponds were also close to his <br />house is in the lowest, flattest area. He stated that if there was a major rain, <br />what would prevent water from going into his backyard. He indicated <br />the pond could be moved north. He also expressed confusion about the c, <br />Way. He stated that the owners of lots 1 and 7, who could not be here <br />concern and opposition to that being connected. <br /> <br /> his <br /> <br />it if <br />en <br /> <br />Joe McDilda, 14321 Neon Street NW stated that in regard to <br />.the Environmental Policy Task Force for Ramsey, and has <br />he has overlaid with the site maps. He stated it was a <br />he thinks any conservation will be very hard because <br />recommends that the Commission look at this <br /> <br />needed. He <br /> <br />Sue DVorak, 14640 Potassium stated she was also on the <br />Siberian Elms on the property, which have been <br />recommends their removal. She also stated there were some Oak <br />moved. · · <br /> <br />She indicated there are <br /> and she <br /> like to see <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas stated he is <br />He indicated there are a si <br />are identified and will be saved where <br />effect, but will detail what trees will be <br />property line and and sizes <br /> <br />of trees <br /> <br />area, <br /> <br />will tr'z. whenever.possible. <br /> in diameter and they <br /> mitigation plan is not in <br /> a line 100 feet within the <br /> has been provided to the City. <br /> <br />Steve Thufl~ Potas~i~ stated that <br />the told to to a plan <br />stated )ointed cottage <br />the said the <br />but he <br /> <br />with the City Council, he believes <br />original sketch in the cottage area. He <br />~s concerned with the density. He indicated <br />area is the same as the single-family home areas, <br />sizes are very.small, some not even half of the <br /> <br />neighboring the likes to point to Liberty on the Lakes, however this <br /> i~Liberty on He indicated those homes are $400,000 to $500,000, not $250,000. <br />as is 'B~},proposed foF~d¢~}opment. He stated that concermng the drainage pond, he hves <br /> '~,~:,~.~. . ~,~¢~' . . . · . . . <br />on the east~Si~e, and w~th t m 74' t on of the proposed homes, he beheves there ~s a flooding risk <br />to ex~stmg ~es. He ~fl support a pl~ to pull water away ~om emst~ng back,ds, and <br />added ~at be~s~tmffof l~dscapmg would be appremated. <br />~. Bjerstedt ~ed ~at ~ey point to Libe~ on the L~es because of the concept, not because <br /> price <br /> <br /> that he has a topographical photo that ShOws the property line and the gap <br /> trees and his property line. He indicated Sue Dvorak was right, there are some trees <br />in~rea that are undes/rable, but there are many good. He thinks the developer should choose <br /> <br />Planning Commission/FebruarY 6, 2003 <br /> Page 14 of 26 <br /> <br />-178- <br /> <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />