My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:45:42 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 12:04:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/25/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'1 <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />the trees to keep. He stated that while he did not bring his pictures, he believes there is <br />of trees that can be saved for both existing and new owners. He added that the devel. <br />done a great job working with the neighbors, and he is very excited about the <br />feeling it will bring value to the city, it just needs a bit more tweaking. <br /> <br />Pete Hoover,. 14590 Sunfish Lake Drive stated his issue was with the <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt. asked what the revised density was. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon indicated it was 3.9 per acre. <br /> <br />Mr. Hoover asked what other developments in the area <br /> <br />principal Planner Trudgeon indicated they were 2.5 <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked how many units would need to <br /> <br />were not a PUD. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon indicated 2 units would need to be <br /> <br />Mr. Hoover asked how big the <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon <br /> <br />5400 <br /> <br />Mr. Hoover indicated he lived in Champl <br /> <br />small. He stated these are half ot <br />for a shed or but that will <br />units is too for that property, <br />stated ill needs a dense <br />there density ~'s, <br /> <br />property~ to <br />appropriate area: <br /> <br />trees~ <br />trees. <br /> <br />about the <br /> they <br /> mentic <br /> <br />He <br /> <br />the <br /> <br /> ~ts square feet and were very <br /> hOSt of his neighbors haVe room <br />be possible in this development. He feels 115 <br />· benefits from this higher density. He <br />be put in an appropriate spot, noting <br />etween the Industrial 'Park and a residential <br />location, you are setting a precedence for the <br />He'encouraged the Commission to use other <br /> <br /> neXt to busier streets and next to the industrial park, for higher density. <br /> and how deep they were, if they were safe for ali the children'in the <br /> to crawl oUt, .but he does not ~,ant to look at Weeds in a dry <br /> a lot has been said about saving trees, but with the current plan <br /> that with: a denser subdivision you will ultimately lose more <br /> put 70 single-family homes in the 28 acres they would save· more. <br /> <br /> 145t~ Lane NW stated she would love to seethe trails go, She Would prefer to <br />ed for something else. She indicated there is .a pedestrian trail on the other side <br /> and if there is another trail there is also sealcoating and maintenance costs~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 6; .2003 <br /> Page 15 of. 26 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.