Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Eng/neer Jankowski advised that the edge of the pond was even with the west third lot (Lot 5), and' the rest is sloping. Chairperson Nixt clarified thatit is 60 feet from the back of the property line. Commissioner Reeve asked if the City required that the ponds be fenced. I zl City Engineer Jankowski indicated they .did not, but stated it was d~ed commissioner Reeve indicated a fountain would answer ~'gsquito Cattails. as well. The motion was continued with these added contin · Aeration will be required in the large drainage · Recommend that 146th not.be connected Commissioner Brauer asked if it needed to be contingent preservation plan and the tree Principal Planner Trudgeon add-on. was in afl letter, :lid not need to be an Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Shepherd and Var~.C~,:~Voting No: Case g6 ~tRequest for ~etch Plan Pres en~*0~. None. Johnson, Brauer, Reeve, abstained. :er Park; Case of Dale' Wirz Associate P1 ~ Wirz has applied for a sketch plan review to subdivide a 37 acre homestead and nursery located on the east side of T.H./~47, ~~e highwa~ i ge at about the 171~ grid line. She stated that the property is -~ ~'~'~'~¢'~':'%~' ' '~*~'~ ~ ' 't's ' e ev ...... ~'~~;~$mgle farmly r~d£~.use an'd x -~ m th rural D eloping D~stnct for which, there ~s .._~ . ,' ~ . %4~ ...... ~ a mirfimuihT2~ s~ze of 2.5,~82. Mr. Wtrz ~s proposing to sub&v~de the eastern portion- of his ~-~' property int~¢~}6~ urban-s~iots,, with a 10,800 square foot minimum. She advised that Mr. · , ~ ~i." . . ~k ';W/Jz. concept'~1o cluste~the number of umts that would be allowed with the 2.5 acre standard i,~, . ~.~ . · . . '~ by reducing th~ize of the lots to urban standards and congregating them ~n One 'small area. She '~ stated service~ould' be provided with communal systems until city sewer and water are w~,available to ~ite, and in the meantime, Mr.. Wirz would be able tO maintain his nursery. She ' 5j~}~Rlamed~tqn order for the C~ty to be able to consider the proposed cluster development, the '}i~lo~:~uld either have to rezone the property to Planned Unit Development or request an am~ht to the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinances to establish 'some guidelines fO~'~t~ister development· [n reviewing the sketch plan, Mr. Wirz' plan does not appear to meet -186- Planning Commission/February 6, 2003 Page 22 of 26 I I I I I I I