Agenda - Council - 03/25/2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-114- Final Plat Review: March 21, 2003 Page 3 of 8 Wildlife Sanctuary 3~d Addition agencies. The City has enacted an ordinance that requires an elevation survey at the time of footing inspection to ensure compliance with the approved grading plan. Current City code requires that contour lines must be shown for every one-foot when grading is. proposed that is less than 2%. It also requires a certificate of survey be required on those lots that have proposed slopes less than 2%. This certificate must be received before a certificate of occupancy is issued. Grading of less than '1% is unacceptable. City code also requires a table be provided by the applicant that specifies house type, garage elevation, minimum floor elevation, lowest opening elevation, street centerline grade, 100- year flood elevation, and back yard and front yard slopes. This table did not include the front and rear yard slopes. Once complete, include on the grading plan and submit to the City Engineer in Excel format in digital form. Show all drainage and utility easements on the grading and drainage plan. Block 1' · The pond that is created by the 100-year flood must be protected (to elevation 886 contour) by a drainage and utility easement in cooperation with the existing landowner.(J..L. Abrahamson). · City code requires all lots to have a minimum of 1% grade. Lot 3, 8 & 9 are proposed to be final graded less than 1%. Please revise. · Grading less than 2% requires a certificate of occupancy. Eastern pr6perty lines of Lots 7-9 are proposed to be graded with a slope less than 2%. · ' Incorrect Lot comer elevation on Lot 6 - NE comer Block 2: · Lots 1 - 3 are proposed with slopes less than 2% and will require certificates of grading prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. · Lots 6 - 8 are proposing side yard grades along the property line less than 1%. Revise contours to reflect positive drainage along property line. Block 3: · None Block 4: · Missing an 882 contour on Lot 6 · Grading is proposed on Lot 1 & 2 that is less than 1%. Please revise. · Grading less than 2% proposed on Lots 3 - 8. certificate of grading will be required. I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I